233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21794864)
1. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture.
Roberge S; Chaillet N; Boutin A; Moore L; Jastrow N; Brassard N; Gauthier RJ; Hudic I; Shipp TD; Weimar CH; Fatusic Z; Demers S; Bujold E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 115(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21794864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.
Hudic I; Bujold E; Fatusic Z; Roberge S; Mandzic A; Fatusic J
Med Arch; 2012; 66(6):412-4. PubMed ID: 23409524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture.
Gyamfi C; Juhasz G; Gyamfi P; Blumenfeld Y; Stone JL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Oct; 19(10):639-43. PubMed ID: 17118738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure.
Kataoka S; Tanuma F; Iwaki Y; Iwaki K; Fujii T; Fujimoto T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 27617416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery.
Durnwald C; Mercer B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4):925-9. PubMed ID: 14586327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Roberge S; Demers S; Berghella V; Chaillet N; Moore L; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 24912096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions.
Blumenfeld YJ; Caughey AB; El-Sayed YY; Daniels K; Lyell DJ
BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 20236104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture.
Bujold E; Goyet M; Marcoux S; Brassard N; Cormier B; Hamilton E; Abdous B; Sidi EAL; Kinch R; Miner L; Masse A; Fortin C; Gagné GP; Fortier A; Bastien G; Sabbah R; Guimond P; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 116(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 20567166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse hysterotomy during cesarean delivery decreases maternal morbidity: a meta-analysis.
Pergialiotis V; Mitsopoulou D; Biliou E; Bellos I; Karagiannis V; Papapanagiotou A; Rodolakis A; Daskalakis G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):128.e1-128.e13. PubMed ID: 33894151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.
Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Rodekamp E; Brauer M; Hinkson L; Kalache K; Henrich W
Ultraschall Med; 2018 Jun; 39(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 27626240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study.
Hesselman S; Högberg U; Ekholm-Selling K; Råssjö EB; Jonsson M
BJOG; 2015 Oct; 122(11):1535-41. PubMed ID: 25088680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review.
Genovese F; Schiattarella A; D'Urso G; Vitale SG; Carugno J; Verzì G; D'Urso V; Iacono E; Siringo S; Leanza V; Palumbo M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 36724750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
