561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21794965)
1. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new approach for the pistoning measurement in transtibial prosthesis.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Lúvíksdóttir Á; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Wan Abas WA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 21975850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of two prosthetic suspension systems in a bilateral transtibial amputee.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Lúvíksdóttir AG; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 91(10):894-8. PubMed ID: 22173083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of a prosthetic suspension system: Looped silicone liner.
Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Eshraghi A; Wan Abas WAB
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 28946824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA; Pirouzi GH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 23408214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi MT; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1028-38. PubMed ID: 23168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study between Dermo, Pelite, and Seal-In X5 liners: effect on patient's satisfaction and perceived problems.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Arifin N; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Abas WA
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():769810. PubMed ID: 25184154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the interactions between a prosthetic socket, polyurethane liners and the residual limb in transtibial amputees using non-linear finite element analysis.
Simpson G; Fisher C; Wright DK
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():343-7. PubMed ID: 11347414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An experimental and theoretical framework for manufacturing prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees.
Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Crawford RH; Rogers WE; Bosker G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 17009490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic Balance Control (DBC) in lower leg amputee subjects; contribution of the regulatory activity of the prosthesis side.
Nederhand MJ; Van Asseldonk EH; van der Kooij H; Rietman HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21889241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot.
Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24161521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Razak NA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 24315710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi M; Gholizadeh H; Soodmand E; Wan Abas WA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96988. PubMed ID: 24865351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
