101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21795069)
1. MRI diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse compared with clinical examination.
Pannu HK; Scatarige JC; Eng J
Acad Radiol; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1245-51. PubMed ID: 21795069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
Pannu HK; Scatarige JC; Eng J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 19188799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lewis MT; Yalamanchili S; Lim RP; Wong S; Bennett GL
Clin Radiol; 2014 Feb; 69(2):e71-7. PubMed ID: 24290773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI findings before and after prolapse surgery.
Alt CD; Brocker KA; Lenz F; Sohn C; Kauczor HU; Hallscheidt P
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):495-504. PubMed ID: 23939382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis.
Gousse AE; Barbaric ZL; Safir MH; Madjar S; Marumoto AK; Raz S
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1606-13. PubMed ID: 11025716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
Gupta S; Sharma JB; Hari S; Kumar S; Roy KK; Singh N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 22678559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging-identified pelvic organ prolapse in pre- and postmenopausal women without clinically evident pelvic organ descent.
Cimsit C; Yoldemir T; Akpinar IN
Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1418-1424. PubMed ID: 26041768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used?
Lienemann A; Sprenger D; Janssen U; Grosch E; Pellengahr C; Anthuber C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 14694454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate anterior pelvic prolapse: H line is the key.
Rechi-Sierra K; Sánchez-Ballester F; García-Ibáñez J; Pardo-Duarte P; Flores-DelaTorre M; Monzó-Cataluña A; López-Alcina E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Apr; 40(4):1042-1047. PubMed ID: 33783877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: dynamic true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus HASTE.
Hecht EM; Lee VS; Tanpitukpongse TP; Babb JS; Taouli B; Wong S; Rosenblum N; Kanofsky JA; Bennett GL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 18647901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging.
Woodfield CA; Hampton BS; Sung V; Brody JM
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Jun; 20(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 19434386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical study on pubococcygeal line determined by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging used in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse].
Miao YL; Zhang XH; Wu J; Kang Y; Hong N; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):900-3. PubMed ID: 21211420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical examination and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in vaginal vault prolapse.
Cortes E; Reid WM; Singh K; Berger L
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 14704242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Imaging pelvic floor prolapse].
Deval B; Vulierme MP; Poilpot S; Menu Y; Levardon M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 12592178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination.
Kelvin FM; Hale DS; Maglinte DD; Patten BJ; Benson JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jul; 173(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 10397095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of new MRI-based measurements to differentiate low and high stages of pelvic organ prolapse using support vector machines.
Onal S; Lai-Yuen S; Bao P; Weitzenfeld A; Hogue D; Hart S
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 25429825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the MR-fluoroscopy in the diagnosis and staging of the pelvic organ prolapse.
Etlik O; Arslan H; Odabaşi O; Odabaşi H; Harman M; Celebi H; Sakarya ME
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jan; 53(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 15607865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI pelvic landmark angles in the assessment of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Ginath S; Garely A; Luchs JS; Shahryarinejad A; Olivera C; Zhou S; Ascher-Walsh C; Condrea A; Brodman M; Vardy M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 20730542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.
Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating functional disorders of female pelvic floor.
Torricelli P; Pecchi A; Caruso Lombardi A; Vetruccio E; Vetruccio S; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(5-6):488-500. PubMed ID: 12207184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
