These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21795668)

  • 1. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
    Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
    Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.
    Jackson SL; Taplin SH; Sickles EA; Abraham L; Barlow WE; Carney PA; Geller B; Berns EA; Cutter GR; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(11):814-27. PubMed ID: 19470953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Abraham L; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Buist DS; Smith-Bindman R; Lehman C; Weaver D; Carney PA; Barlow WE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jul; 102(14):1040-51. PubMed ID: 20601590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.
    Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Lehman CD; Taplin SH; Sickles EA;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):493-502. PubMed ID: 22007043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilization of Computer-Aided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016.
    Keen JD; Keen JM; Keen JE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jan; 15(1 Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 28993109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated With Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers.
    Henderson LM; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Wernli KJ; Sprague BL; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):676-84. PubMed ID: 26295657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
    Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
    Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.
    Barlow WE; White E; Ballard-Barbash R; Vacek PM; Titus-Ernstoff L; Carney PA; Tice JA; Buist DS; Geller BM; Rosenberg R; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Sep; 98(17):1204-14. PubMed ID: 16954473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.
    Taplin S; Abraham L; Barlow WE; Fenton JJ; Berns EA; Carney PA; Cutter GR; Sickles EA; Carl D; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jun; 100(12):876-87. PubMed ID: 18544742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.