These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21795668)

  • 21. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
    Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers.
    Dean JC; Ilvento CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 16794150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.
    Birdwell RL; Bandodkar P; Ikeda DM
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):451-7. PubMed ID: 16040901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
    Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
    Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Gur D; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Ganott M; Hakim C; Hardesty L; Poller WR; Shah R; Wallace L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 14759985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. External validation of Medicare claims codes for digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
    Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Lindfors KK; Hubbard RA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1344-7. PubMed ID: 22695737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Laya MB; Larson EB; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):643-9. PubMed ID: 8627640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
    Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
    The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
    Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
    van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
    Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
    J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review.
    Henriksen EL; Carlsen JF; Vejborg IM; Nielsen MB; Lauridsen CA
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 29665706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.