These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21795668)
41. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. Gromet M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study. Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors. Cook AJ; Elmore JG; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Aiello Bowles EJ; Cutter GR; Carney PA J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 63(4):441-51. PubMed ID: 19744825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Ductal carcinoma in situ: computer-aided detection in screening mammography. Pai VR; Gregory NE; Swinford AE; Rebner M Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 17053200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis abnormality score trends in the serial mammography of patients with breast cancer. Lee SE; Han K; Rho M; Kim EK Eur J Radiol; 2024 Sep; 178():111626. PubMed ID: 39024665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The mammography screening detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer according to women's characteristics: is it the same? Théberge I; Vandal N; Guertin MH; Perron L Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(2):525-535. PubMed ID: 30564969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. Cupples TE; Cunningham JE; Reynolds JC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):944-50. PubMed ID: 16177413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer]. Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography. Murakami R; Kumita S; Tani H; Yoshida T; Sugizaki K; Kuwako T; Kiriyama T; Hakozaki K; Okazaki E; Yanagihara K; Iida S; Haga S; Tsuchiya S J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):768-73. PubMed ID: 23319110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Positive Predictive Values of Abnormality Scores From a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Mammography. Lee SE; Hong H; Kim EK Korean J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 25(4):343-350. PubMed ID: 38528692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer. Chu WC; Lam WW; Pang AL; So NM; Tang AP; Tse GM; Ahuja AT Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15191097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United States. Henderson LM; O'Meara ES; Braithwaite D; Onega T; Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1379-86. PubMed ID: 25537958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study. Guerriero C; Gillan MG; Cairns J; Wallis MG; Gilbert FJ BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Jan; 11():11. PubMed ID: 21241473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]