131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21797262)
1. Quantitative risk-based approach for improving water quality management in mining.
Liu W; Moran CJ; Vink S
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7459-64. PubMed ID: 21797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relating landscape characteristics to non-point source pollution in mine waste-located watersheds using geospatial techniques.
Xiao H; Ji W
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 16551489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Synoptic monitoring as an approach to discriminating between point and diffuse source contributions to zinc loads in mining impacted catchments.
Banks VJ; Palumbo-Roe B
J Environ Monit; 2010 Sep; 12(9):1684-98. PubMed ID: 20625579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental and human exposure assessment monitoring of communities near an abandoned mercury mine in the Philippines: a toxic legacy.
Maramba NP; Reyes JP; Francisco-Rivera AT; Panganiban LC; Dioquino C; Dando N; Timbang R; Akagi H; Castillo MT; Quitoriano C; Afuang M; Matsuyama A; Eguchi T; Fuchigami Y
J Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 81(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 16949727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive management for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in source water: a case study in an agricultural catchment in South Australia.
Bryan BA; Kandulu J; Deere DA; White M; Frizenschaf J; Crossman ND
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):3122-34. PubMed ID: 19515479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management-oriented sensitivity analysis for pesticide transport in watershed-scale water quality modeling using SWAT.
Luo Y; Zhang M
Environ Pollut; 2009 Dec; 157(12):3370-8. PubMed ID: 19616876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental impact of mining activities on the surface water quality in Tibet: Gyama valley.
Huang X; Sillanpää M; Gjessing ET; Peräniemi S; Vogt RD
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(19):4177-84. PubMed ID: 20542540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A methodology for the assessment of rehabilitation success of post mining landscapes--sediment and radionuclide transport at the former Nabarlek uranium mine, Northern Territory, Australia.
Hancock GR; Grabham MK; Martin P; Evans KG; Bollhöfer A
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Feb; 354(2-3):103-19. PubMed ID: 16242178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-reclamation water quality trend in a Mid-Appalachian watershed of abandoned mine lands.
Wei X; Wei H; Viadero RC
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Feb; 409(5):941-8. PubMed ID: 21167556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Historical reconstruction of wastewater and land use impacts to groundwater used for public drinking water: exposure assessment using chemical data and GIS.
Swartz CH; Rudel RA; Kachajian JR; Brody JG
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 13(5):403-16. PubMed ID: 12973368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrimination between diffuse and point sources of arsenic at Zimapán, Hidalgo state, Mexico.
Sracek O; Armienta MA; Rodríguez R; Villaseñor G
J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):329-37. PubMed ID: 20082029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A national strategy for identification, prioritisation and management of pollution from abandoned non-coal mine sites in England and Wales. I. Methodology development and initial results.
Mayes WM; Johnston D; Potter HA; Jarvis AP
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Oct; 407(21):5435-47. PubMed ID: 19660783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of E.U. Water Framework Directive: source assessment of metallic substances at catchment levels.
Chon HS; Ohandja DG; Voulvoulis N
J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 20081997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New methods to monitor emerging chemicals in the drinking water production chain.
van Wezel A; Mons M; van Delft W
J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 20082002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamics of arsenic in the mining sites of Pine Creek Geosyncline, Northern Australia.
Eapaea MP; Parry D; Noller B
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Jul; 379(2-3):201-15. PubMed ID: 17499841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pollutant fate and spatio-temporal variability in the choptank river estuary: factors influencing water quality.
Whitall D; Hively WD; Leight AK; Hapeman CJ; McConnell LL; Fisher T; Rice CP; Codling E; McCarty GW; Sadeghi AM; Gustafson A; Bialek K
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(9):2096-108. PubMed ID: 20171715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impacts of mining on water and soil.
Warhate SR; Yenkie MK; Pokale WK
J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Apr; 49(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 18476409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Well water contaminated by acidic mine water from the Dabaoshan Mine, south China: chemistry and toxicity.
Chen A; Lin C; Lu W; Wu Y; Ma Y; Li J; Zhu L
Chemosphere; 2007 Dec; 70(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 17910972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mining and urban impacts on semi-arid freshwater aquatic systems: the example of Mount Isa, Queensland.
Taylor MP; Mackay A; Kuypers T; Hudson-Edwards K
J Environ Monit; 2009 May; 11(5):977-86. PubMed ID: 19436855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW).
Mooney C; Farrier D
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
