189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21798301)
1. Classification of skin sensitizing substances: a comparison between approaches used by the DFG-MAK Commission and the European Union legislation.
Lessmann H; Uter W; Diepgen TL; Drexler H; Fartasch M; Greim H; Hartwig A; Kreis P; Löser E; Merget R; Merk H; Nowak D; Rothe A; Stropp G; Schnuch A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21798301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evaluation and hazard classification of toxicological information for Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System material safety data sheets.
Côté R; Davis H; Dimock C; Korpan M; Loewen K; Segal LM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Feb; 27(1 Pt 1):61-74. PubMed ID: 9629597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allocation of reliable analytical procedures for human biomonitoring published by the DFG Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area.
Göen T; Eckert E; Schäferhenrich A; Hartwig A
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21940207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hazard classification of chemicals inducing haemolytic anaemia: An EU regulatory perspective.
Muller A; Jacobsen H; Healy E; McMickan S; Istace F; Blaude MN; Howden P; Fleig H; Schulte A;
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Aug; 45(3):229-41. PubMed ID: 16793184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of predictive modeling as a scientific criterion in dermal hazard identification for assignment of skin notations.
Chen CP; Ahlers HW; Scott Dotson G; Lin YC; Chang WC; Maier A; Gadagbui B
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 21712060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Harmonisation of standards related to limiting chemical risk associated with work processes.
Bostan I
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013; 20(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 24069850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximum workplace concentration values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.
Bartsch R; Forderkunz S; Reuter U; Sterzl-Eckert H; Greim H
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Dec; 106 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1291-3. PubMed ID: 9860883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relevance of the mouse skin initiation-promotion model for the classification of carcinogenic substances encountered at the workplace.
Schwarz M; Thielmann HW; Meischner V; Fartasch M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 25846367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Barriers for the prevention of chemical exposures in pregnant and breast-feeding workers?
Romano D; Moreno N
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2010 Mar; 64(3):193. PubMed ID: 20203121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin ('Sh') or for the airways ('Sa')?
Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Schulz KH; Becker D; Diepgen TL; Drexler H; Erdmann S; Fartasch M; Greim H; Kricke-Helling P; Merget R; Merk H; Nowak D; Rothe A; Stropp G; Uter W; Wallenstein G
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2002 Aug; 21(8):439-44. PubMed ID: 12412637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examples of MAK values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.
Reuter U; Rengel I; Sterzl-Eckert H; Forderkunz S; Bartsch R; Greim H
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996; 34(11-12):1167-8. PubMed ID: 9119333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Regulations for the protection of workers against the effects of hazardous substances at the workplace].
Wolf T
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Mar; 51(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 18369561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Problems concerning the integration of "derived-no-effect-levels" (DNELS) into occupational safety and health regulations].
Gromiec J
Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18663897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Products toxic to reproduction used in the occupational environment: Definition, risk assessment, classification].
Lafon D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Oct; 34(10):950-4. PubMed ID: 16997605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpreting REACH guidance in the determination of the derived no effect level (DNEL).
Kreider ML; Spencer Williams E
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 20655351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Seveso II experience in the application of generic substance criteria to identify major hazard sites.
Wood MH
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Nov; 171(1-3):16-28. PubMed ID: 19632041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Occupational exposure to biological agents and the protection of exposed workers according to the new legal regulations].
Zielińska-Jankiewicz K; Kozajda A; Szadkowska-Stańczyk I
Med Pr; 2005; 56(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 16457370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The European Community Directive on the classification and labeling of chemicals for reproductive toxicity.
Sullivan FM
J Occup Environ Med; 1995 Aug; 37(8):966-9. PubMed ID: 8520962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals.
Foth H; Hayes A
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):443-61. PubMed ID: 18784197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biomonitoring for occupational medicine].
Drexler H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 Mar; 138(10):484-7. PubMed ID: 23444025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
