These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21798715)

  • 1. Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox.
    Wang YC; Magasi SR; Bohannon RW; Reuben DB; McCreath HE; Bubela DJ; Gershon RC; Rymer WZ
    J Hand Ther; 2011; 24(4):313-20; quiz 321. PubMed ID: 21798715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dexterity as measured with the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) across the age span.
    Wang YC; Bohannon RW; Kapellusch J; Garg A; Gershon RC
    J Hand Ther; 2015; 28(1):53-9; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 25449717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Tyneside Pegboard Test: development, validation, and observations in unilateral cerebral palsy.
    Basu AP; Kirkpatrick EV; Wright B; Pearse JE; Best KE; Eyre JA
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2018 Mar; 60(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 29247458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normative and validation studies of the Nine-hole Peg Test with children.
    Smith YA; Hong E; Presson C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):823-43. PubMed ID: 10883762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for identifying the adaptations responsible for differences in pegboard times between middle-aged and older adults.
    Hamilton LD; Thomas E; Almuklass AM; Enoka RM
    Exp Gerontol; 2017 Oct; 97():9-16. PubMed ID: 28688836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peg-manipulation capabilities of middle-aged adults have a greater influence on pegboard times than those of young and old adults.
    Almuklass AM; Feeney DF; Mani D; Hamilton LD; Enoka RM
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2165-2172. PubMed ID: 29785485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peg-manipulation capabilities during a test of manual dexterity differ for persons with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals.
    Almuklass AM; Feeney DF; Mani D; Hamilton LD; Enoka RM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3487-3493. PubMed ID: 28849332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poor estimates of motor variability are associated with longer grooved pegboard times for middle-aged and older adults.
    Hamilton LD; Mazzo MR; Petrigna L; Ahmed AA; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Feb; 121(2):588-601. PubMed ID: 30540504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: performance as a function of handedness and sex.
    Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):258-68. PubMed ID: 15963376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and reliability of the Functional Dexterity Test in children.
    Tissue CM; Velleman PF; Stegink-Jansen CW; Aaron DH; Winthrop BG; Gogola GR
    J Hand Ther; 2017; 30(4):500-506. PubMed ID: 27863735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson's disease.
    Soke F; Colakoglu BD; Keskinoglu P; Genc A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 186():105542. PubMed ID: 31605895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing manual dexterity: Comparing the WorkAbility Rate of Manipulation Test with the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test.
    Wang YC; Wickstrom R; Yen SC; Kapellusch J; Grogan KA
    J Hand Ther; 2018; 31(3):339-347. PubMed ID: 28501480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two measures of laterality in handedness: the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and the Purdue Pegboard test of manual dexterity.
    Verdino M; Dingman S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):476-8. PubMed ID: 9638746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tyneside Pegboard Test for unimanual and bimanual dexterity in unilateral cerebral palsy: association with sensorimotor impairment.
    Decraene L; Feys H; Klingels K; Basu A; Ortibus E; Simon-Martinez C; Mailleux L
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 Jul; 63(7):874-882. PubMed ID: 33720409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and test-retest reliability assessment of a low-cost, 3D printed tool for assessing different aspects of hand dexterity.
    Wilson N; Hough E; Hamilton A; Verdonck M; Clark R
    J Hand Ther; 2023; 36(1):133-138. PubMed ID: 34304977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The test-retest reliability and the minimal detectable change of the Purdue pegboard test in schizophrenia.
    Lee P; Liu CH; Fan CW; Lu CP; Lu WS; Hsieh CL
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 Jun; 112(6):332-7. PubMed ID: 23787010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over.
    Desrosiers J; Hébert R; Bravo G; Dutil E
    Disabil Rehabil; 1995 Jul; 17(5):217-24. PubMed ID: 7626768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between tests of attention and performance on grooved and Purdue pegboards in normal subjects.
    Strenge H; Niederberger U; Seelhorst U
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):507-14. PubMed ID: 12434843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Purdue Pegboard test: normative data for older adults with low vision.
    Wittich W; Nadon C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Apr; 12(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 26746872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Cognitive, Emotional, and Motor Domains in Patients with Diffuse Gliomas Using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Battery.
    Lang S; Cadeaux M; Opoku-Darko M; Gaxiola-Valdez I; Partlo LA; Goodyear BG; Federico P; Kelly J
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():448-456. PubMed ID: 28039096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.