138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2179991)
1. When is it malpractice to miss lung cancer on chest radiographs?
Potchen EJ; Bisesi MA
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2179991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Malpractice suits in chest radiology: an evaluation of the histories of 8265 radiologists.
Baker SR; Patel RH; Yang L; Lelkes VM; Castro A
J Thorac Imaging; 2013 Nov; 28(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 24149862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vicarious liability.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):621-4. PubMed ID: 9275865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Professional liability insurance.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):565-9. PubMed ID: 9490932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure to diagnose lung cancer: anatomy of a malpractice trial.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12490474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Malpractice issues in radiology. Alliterative errors.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 10749224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography: imaging and medicolegal issues.
White CS; Salis AI; Meyer CA
J Thorac Imaging; 1999 Jan; 14(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 9894954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malpractice issues in radiology. Perceptual errors.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):587-90. PubMed ID: 8751657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice in diagnostic radiology: claims, compensation, and patient injury.
Hamer MM; Morlock F; Foley HT; Ros PR
Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):263-6. PubMed ID: 3588916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The deep pocket.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 11044015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Did I miss that: subtle and commonly missed findings on chest radiographs.
Ropp A; Waite S; Reede D; Patel J
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2015; 44(3):277-89. PubMed ID: 25445879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing new radiographs with those obtained previously.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 9888727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Communication of the significant but not urgent finding.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):329-31. PubMed ID: 9016199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are radiologists contracted by third parties to interpret radiographs liable for not communicating results directly to patients?
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11756081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Liability of performing CT screening for coronary artery disease and lung cancer.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):837-42. PubMed ID: 12239021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Will Saying "I'm Sorry" Prevent a Malpractice Lawsuit?
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 16794148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of patient registration and processing.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1483-6. PubMed ID: 9393149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure to communicate.
Avery JK
Tenn Med; 2006 Nov; 99(11):32-3. PubMed ID: 17124909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The jury and standard of care: proper or perfect?
Munn S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 May; 7(5):322-4. PubMed ID: 20439070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Errors in judgment.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1259-61. PubMed ID: 8633426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
