These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21800483)

  • 1. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.
    Paulo S; Mendes S; Vizinho R; Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1187-98. PubMed ID: 15587576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding statistical terms: 4 - Diagnostic tests.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Jun; 47(6):71-2. PubMed ID: 19494344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity, predictive values, pretest-posttest probabilities, and likelihood ratios of presurgery clinical diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancers.
    Ermertcan AT; Oztürk F; Gençoğlan G; Eskiizmir G; Temiz P; Horasan GD
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Mar; 30(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20950248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
    Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
    J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
    Bloch DA
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
    Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
    Van Meerhaeghe A
    Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New patient-oriented diagnostic test characteristics analogous to the likelihood ratios conveyed information on trustworthiness.
    Linn S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15845331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical methods for evidence-based medicine: the diagnostic test. Part II.
    Antonelli P; Chiumello D; Cesana BM
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2008 Sep; 74(9):481-8. PubMed ID: 18356804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
    Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.