158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21801443)
1. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.
de Haan J; Goei H; Schep NW; Tuinebreijer WE; Patka P; den Hartog D
J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jul; 6():39. PubMed ID: 21801443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score.
Ngwayi JRM; Tan J; Liang N; Sita EGE; Porter DE
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 15(1):562. PubMed ID: 33243269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score.
Yosmaoglu HB; Doğan D; Sonmezer E
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Sep; 11(1):95. PubMed ID: 27586810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score.
Padovani S; Capuzzo M; Massari L; Caruso G; Arrigoni P; Zaolino C; Cucchi D; Valpiani G; Colozza A
JSES Int; 2021 Mar; 5(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 33681858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Danish version of the Oxford Elbow Score.
Plaschke HC; Jørgensen A; Thillemann TM; Brorson S; Olsen BS
Dan Med J; 2013 Oct; 60(10):A4714. PubMed ID: 24083528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Validation of the German version of the Oxford Elbow Score : A cross-sectional study].
Marquardt J; Schöttker-Königer T; Schäfer A
Orthopade; 2016 Aug; 45(8):695-700. PubMed ID: 27385387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period.
Jonsson EÖ; Wänström J; Björnsson Hallgren H; Adolfsson L
JSES Int; 2023 May; 7(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 37266162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-cultural validation of the Oxford Elbow Score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Greek.
Giannaka M; Andrigiannakis A; Dimitriadis Z; Fandridis E; Kapreli E; Strimpakos N
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2022 Feb; 57():102499. PubMed ID: 34999382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal important change and other measurement properties of the Oxford Elbow Score and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand in patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation study alongside the multicenter FuncSiE trial.
Iordens GIT; Den Hartog D; Tuinebreijer WE; Eygendaal D; Schep NWL; Verhofstad MHJ; Van Lieshout EMM;
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0182557. PubMed ID: 28886018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the persian version of the oxford elbow score.
Ebrahimzadeh MH; Kachooei AR; Vahedi E; Moradi A; Mashayekhi Z; Hallaj-Moghaddam M; Azami M; Birjandinejad A
Int J Rheumatol; 2014; 2014():381237. PubMed ID: 25214845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.
de Haan J; Schep N; Tuinebreijer W; Patka P; den Hartog D
Patient Relat Outcome Meas; 2011 Jul; 2():145-9. PubMed ID: 22915975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimal important difference, patient acceptable symptom state and longitudinal validity of oxford elbow score and the quickDASH in patients with tennis elbow.
Karjalainen T; Lähdeoja T; Salmela M; Ardern CL; Juurakko J; Järvinen TL; Taimela S;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):158. PubMed ID: 37415100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity of the Dutch Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE-D).
van Ark M; Zwerver J; Diercks RL; van den Akker-Scheek I
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Aug; 15():270. PubMed ID: 25112272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-NL) in dental patients with and without self-reported tooth wear.
Wetselaar P; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Larsson P; John MT; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 42(11):803-9. PubMed ID: 26037598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire on lateral elbow tendinopathy for French-speaking patients.
Kaux JF; Delvaux F; Schaus J; Demoulin C; Locquet M; Buckinx F; Beaudart C; Dardenne N; Van Beveren J; Croisier JL; Forthomme B; Bruyère O
J Hand Ther; 2016; 29(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 27769841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability Testing of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Post-operative Patients.
Baessler A; Eason RR; Joyce MR; Dibaba DT; Wan JY; Azar FM; Brolin TJ; Throckmorton TW
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2022; 31(4):229-232. PubMed ID: 36594979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version.
Beauchemin G; MacDermid JC; Bourduas K; Poirier MF; Gaudelli C; Rouleau DM
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 25936242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6).
Hutting N; Engels JA; Heerkens YF; Staal JB; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW
J Occup Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 24(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 23868673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.
Schlösser TP; Stadhouder A; Schimmel JJ; Lehr AM; van der Heijden GJ; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 24360746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.
Lin K; Bao L; Wang J; Fujita K; Makimoto K; Liao X
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2992-3004. PubMed ID: 28884273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
