These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21801799)

  • 1. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite.
    Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Appelt A; Naumann M; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):643-7. PubMed ID: 21801799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Roggendorf MJ; Naumann M; Taschner M
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 19058678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro.
    Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Dippold C; Vosen VE; Naumann M; Jablonski-Momeni A; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 22960537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amalgam Alternatives Critically Evaluated: Effect of Long-term Thermomechanical Loading on Marginal Quality, Wear, and Fracture Behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Dudek MC; Winter J; Braun A; Krämer N; von Stein-Lausnitz M; Roggendorf MJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 32030381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength of the bond as a predictor of marginal performance: an in vitro evaluation of contemporary adhesives.
    Bortolotto T; Mileo A; Krejci I
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 20005563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Adaptation of Flowable vs Sonically Activated or Preheated Resin Composites in Cervical Lesions.
    Scepanovic D; Par M; Attin T; Tauböck TT
    J Adhes Dent; 2022 May; 24():247-257. PubMed ID: 35575657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
    Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.