These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21801823)

  • 1. A model-based analysis of the "combined-stimulation advantage".
    Seldran F; Micheyl C; Truy E; Berger-Vachon C; Thai-Van H; Gallego S
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):252-64. PubMed ID: 21801823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.
    Shofner WP; Campbell J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL398-404. PubMed ID: 23145701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1280-9. PubMed ID: 20815463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2287-94. PubMed ID: 18397033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Older and younger adults' identification of sentences filtered with amplitude and frequency modulations in quiet and noise.
    Mahajan Y; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL190. PubMed ID: 28863573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
    Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toddlers' recognition of noise-vocoded speech.
    Newman R; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):483-94. PubMed ID: 23297920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing models of the combined-stimulation advantage for speech recognition.
    Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):3970-80. PubMed ID: 22559370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.
    Dorman MF; Gifford RH
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):912-9. PubMed ID: 20874053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.