These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21802069)

  • 1. Combined effects of acoustic and visual distraction on cognitive performance and well-being.
    Liebl A; Haller J; Jödicke B; Baumgartner H; Schlittmeier S; Hellbrück J
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 21802069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types--a laboratory experiment.
    Haka M; Haapakangas A; Keränen J; Hakala J; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2009 Dec; 19(6):454-67. PubMed ID: 19702627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Thaden R; Vorländer M
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):719-36. PubMed ID: 18432448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The effect of low frequency noise on human mental performance].
    Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Waszkowska M; Szymczak W; Kameduła M; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 15156769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open-plan office noise: the susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech.
    Jahncke H
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(61):315-20. PubMed ID: 23257585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female voice communications in high level aircraft cockpit noises--part II: vocoder and automatic speech recognition systems.
    Nixon C; Anderson T; Morris L; McCavitt A; McKinley R; Yeager D; McDaniel M
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1087-94. PubMed ID: 9819167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance.
    Venetjoki N; Kaarlela-Tuomaala A; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Ergonomics; 2006 Sep; 49(11):1068-91. PubMed ID: 16950722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance.
    Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2005 Dec; 15(6):458-68. PubMed ID: 16268835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test.
    Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Houtgast T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 19778398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Respirator performance ratings for speech intelligibility.
    Coyne KM; Johnson AT; Yeni-Komshian GH; Dooly CR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Apr; 59(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 9586201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive and motor mechanisms underlying older adults' ability to divide attention while walking.
    Hall CD; Echt KV; Wolf SL; Rogers WA
    Phys Ther; 2011 Jul; 91(7):1039-50. PubMed ID: 21527384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts.
    Liang Y; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 20380916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.
    Fraser S; Gagné JP; Alepins M; Dubois P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 19635945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.