These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21802228)

  • 1. Investigation into the use of photoanthropometry in facial image comparison.
    Moreton R; Morley J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):231-7. PubMed ID: 21802228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of 2D to 3D dimensions and proportionality indices for facial examination.
    Martos R; Valsecchi A; Ibáñez O; Alemán I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():142-152. PubMed ID: 29665481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs.
    Kleinberg KF; Vanezis P; Burton AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):779-83. PubMed ID: 17524059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer assisted photo-anthropometric analyses of full-face and profile facial images.
    Davis JP; Valentine T; Davis RE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jul; 200(1-3):165-76. PubMed ID: 20570069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 2D/3D image (facial) comparison using camera matching.
    Goos MI; Alberink IB; Ruifrok AC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Nov; 163(1-2):10-7. PubMed ID: 16337353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photoanthropometry of the Face in the Young White Brazilian Population.
    Gonzales PS; Machado CEP; Michel-Crosato E
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(6):619-623. PubMed ID: 30517486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Poor reliability of facial indices for comparative metric facial identification without parametrical superimposition.
    Introna F; De Donno A; Santoro V; Carbonara M
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2007 Dec; 3(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 25869268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial motor function monitored by hand held calipers versus computer-assisted photography.
    Clapham L; Bottoms S; Mehta R; Davis A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Dec; 148(12):1281-7; discussion 1287. PubMed ID: 17091210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-individual variability of the facial morphology during conscious smiling.
    Holberg C; Maier C; Steinhäuser S; Rudzki-Janson I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):234-43. PubMed ID: 16838092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
    de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the Skull-to-Camera Distance from Facial Photographs for Craniofacial Superimposition.
    Stephan CN
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):850-860. PubMed ID: 28097661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique.
    Bush K; Antonyshyn O
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Aug; 98(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 8764710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach for the analysis of facial growth and age estimation: Iris ratio.
    Machado CEP; Flores MRP; Lima LNC; Tinoco RLR; Franco A; Bezerra ACB; Evison MP; Guimarães MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180330. PubMed ID: 28686631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of some problematic factors in facial image identification using a 2D/3D superimposition technique.
    Atsuchi M; Tsuji A; Usumoto Y; Yoshino M; Ikeda N
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Sep; 15(5):244-8. PubMed ID: 23886899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.