These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21802228)

  • 21. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A method of orientation of skull and camera for use in forensic photographic investigation.
    McKenna JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1988 May; 33(3):751-5. PubMed ID: 3385384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability of facial photographs for use in treatment planning for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
    Strauss RA; Weis BD; Lindauer SJ; Rebellato J; Isaacson RJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 9511490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variation in proportion indices and angles between selected facial landmarks with rotation in the Frankfort plane.
    Kleinberg KF; Vanezis P
    Med Sci Law; 2007 Apr; 47(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17520955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-Fidelity Anthropometric Facial Measurements Can Be Obtained From a Single Stereophotograph From the Vectra H1 3-Dimensional Camera.
    Jodeh DS; Rottgers SA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1164-1170. PubMed ID: 30955356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Preliminary Study of the Reliability of Anatomical Facial Landmarks Used in Facial Comparison.
    Lee WJ; Kim DM; Lee UY; Cho JH; Kim MS; Hong JH; Hwang YI
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):519-527. PubMed ID: 30107642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of facial features with a range camera.
    Strömland K; Chen Y; Michael G; Svensson E; Gustavsson T
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1998 Mar; 32(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9556823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New insights into facial anthropometry in digital photographs using iris dependent calibration.
    Driessen JP; Vuyk H; Borgstein J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 21329992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types.
    Arslan SG; Genç C; Odabaş B; Kama JD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 32(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 17952492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy and reliability of facial soft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jun; 199(1-3):9-14. PubMed ID: 20236780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-assisted facial image identification system using a 3-D physiognomic range finder.
    Yoshino M; Matsuda H; Kubota S; Imaizumi K; Miyasaka S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Apr; 109(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 10725658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of natural head position on the assessment of facial morphology.
    Woźniak K; Piątkowska D; Lipski M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2012; 21(6):743-9. PubMed ID: 23457132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An anatomical and photographic technique for forensic facial identification.
    Porter G; Doran G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Nov; 114(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10967250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accurate facial morphologic measurements using a 3-camera photogrammetric method.
    Deli R; Gioia ED; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correcting the planar perspective projection in geometric structures applied to forensic facial analysis.
    Baldasso RP; Tinoco RLR; Vieira CSM; Fernandes MM; Oliveira RN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():73-77. PubMed ID: 27565319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A guided manual method for juvenile age progression using digital images.
    Liu CYJ; Wilkinson C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110170. PubMed ID: 32066014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pitfalls at the root of facial assessment on photographs: a quantitative study of accuracy in positioning facial landmarks.
    Cummaudo M; Guerzoni M; Marasciuolo L; Gibelli D; Cigada A; Obertovà Z; Ratnayake M; Poppa P; Gabriel P; Ritz-Timme S; Cattaneo C
    Int J Legal Med; 2013 May; 127(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 23515681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Photoanthropometric face iridial proportions for age estimation: An investigation using features selected via a joint mutual information criterion.
    Borges DL; Vidal FB; Flores MRP; Melani RFH; Guimarães MA; Machado CEP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():9-14. PubMed ID: 29367173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.
    Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements.
    Aung SC; Ngim RC; Lee ST
    Br J Plast Surg; 1995 Dec; 48(8):551-8. PubMed ID: 8548155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.