BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21802449)

  • 1. Is the observation of the human kinematics sufficient to activate automatic imitation of transitive actions?
    Campione GC; Gentilucci M
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 225(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 21802449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic grasp imitation following action observation affects estimation of intrinsic object properties.
    Gianelli C; Dalla Volta R; Barbieri F; Gentilucci M
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():166-80. PubMed ID: 18514170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covert imitation of transitive actions activates effector-independent motor representations affecting "motor" knowledge of target-object properties.
    Campione GC; Gentilucci M
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 207(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 19850083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping.
    Craighero L; Bonetti F; Massarenti L; Canto R; Fabbri Destro M; Fadiga L
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 18394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The observation of manual grasp actions affects the control of speech: a combined behavioral and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study.
    Gentilucci M; Campione GC; Dalla Volta R; Bernardis P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3190-202. PubMed ID: 19654016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observed reach trajectory influences executed reach kinematics in prehension.
    Hardwick RM; Edwards MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1082-93. PubMed ID: 21287427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic priming of grip force following action observation.
    Salama IM; Turner S; Edwards MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 21512959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Activation differences in observation of hand movements for imitation or velocity judgement.
    Suchan B; Melde C; Herzog H; Hömberg V; Seitz RJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 188(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18054399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of observed biological and non biological movements on action imitation: an fMRI study.
    Crescentini C; Mengotti P; Grecucci A; Rumiati RI
    Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1420():80-92. PubMed ID: 21959173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action observation and speech production: study on children and adults.
    Gentilucci M; Stefanini S; Roy AC; Santunione P
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1554-67. PubMed ID: 15246292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion.
    Kilner J; Hamilton AF; Blakemore SJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2007; 2(3-4):158-66. PubMed ID: 18633814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the neural correlates underlying action observation in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Pierno AC; Turella L; Grossi P; Tubaldi F; Calabrese M; Perini P; Barachino L; Morra A; Gallo P; Castiello U
    Exp Neurol; 2009 Jun; 217(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 19285072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viewing hand grip enhances observer's grip force in a body-part-specific manner.
    Hirose S; Oouchida Y; Matsumura M; Naito E
    Neuroreport; 2009 Oct; 20(16):1477-80. PubMed ID: 19786923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceiving the unusual: temporal properties of hierarchical motor representations for action perception.
    Demiris Y; Simmons G
    Neural Netw; 2006 Apr; 19(3):272-84. PubMed ID: 16595173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Movement observation specifies motor programs activated by the action observed objective.
    Lago A; Fernandez-del-Olmo M
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 493(3):102-6. PubMed ID: 21354271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of perspective on the neural correlates of motor resonance during natural action observation.
    Vingerhoets G; Stevens L; Meesdom M; Honoré P; Vandemaele P; Achten E
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2012; 22(5):752-67. PubMed ID: 22591109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple movement imitation: are kinematic features sufficient to map perceptions into actions?
    Noy L; Rumiati RI; Flash T
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):360-8. PubMed ID: 18834653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex.
    Ferrari PF; Rozzi S; Fogassi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):212-26. PubMed ID: 15811234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.