These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology. Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Radiofrequency Technology to Prevent Retained Sponges and Improve Patient Outcomes. Primiano M; Sparks D; Murphy J; Glaser K; McNett M AORN J; 2020 Oct; 112(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 32990961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of factors associated with retained surgical sponges in veterinary patients: a survey of veterinary practitioners. Rodriguez FR; Kirby BM; Ryan J J Small Anim Pract; 2018 Sep; 59(9):570-577. PubMed ID: 29971789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retained surgical sponges: a descriptive study of 319 occurrences and contributing factors from 2012 to 2017. Steelman VM; Shaw C; Shine L; Hardy-Fairbanks AJ Patient Saf Surg; 2018; 12():20. PubMed ID: 29988638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval? Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery. Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A system-wide initiative to prevent retained vaginal sponges. Chagolla BA; Gibbs VC; Keats JP; Pelletreau B MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2011; 36(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 21857202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity. Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the Systematic Sponge Count an Impediment to Patient Care During Plastic Surgical Procedures? Geeroms M; Pai A; Ceuterick B; Kapila A Plast Aesthet Nurs (Phila); 2022 Apr-Jun 01; 42(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 36450091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Counting matters: lessons from the root cause analysis of a retained surgical item. Agrawal A Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2012 Dec; 38(12):566-74. PubMed ID: 23240265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months. Cima RR; Kollengode A; Clark J; Pool S; Weisbrod C; Amstutz GJ; Deschamps C Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2011 Feb; 37(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 21939132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]