384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21802588)
1. EUS and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer: a prospective and comparative study.
Fernández-Esparrach G; Ayuso-Colella JR; Sendino O; Pagés M; Cuatrecasas M; Pellisé M; Maurel J; Ayuso-Colella C; González-Suárez B; Llach J; Castells A; Ginès A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 21802588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience.
Kocaman O; Baysal B; Şentürk H; İnce AT; Müslümanoğlu M; Kocakoç E; Arıcı S; Uysal Ö; Yıldız K; Türkdoğan K; Danalıoğlu A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 25(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25599779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Bianchi P; Ceriani C; Palmisano A; Pompili G; Passoni GR; Rottoli M; Cappellani A; Montorsi M
Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staging of rectal cancer by EUS: depth of infiltration in T3 cancers is important.
Jürgensen C; Teubner A; Habeck JO; Diener F; Scherübl H; Stölzel U
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Feb; 73(2):325-8. PubMed ID: 21176897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between the reference values of MRI and EUS and their usefulness to surgeons in rectal cancer.
Yimei J; Ren Z; Lu X; Huan Z
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Dec; 16(15):2069-77. PubMed ID: 23280021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of the performance and interobserver variation in endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer.
El Hajj II; DeWitt J; Sherman S; Imperiale TF; LeBlanc JK; McHenry L; Cote GA; Johnson CS; Al-Haddad M
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 29846267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [MR-endoscopic US correlation for loco-regional staging of rectal carcinoma].
Anthonioz-Lescop C; Aubé C; Luet D; Lermite E; Burtin P; Ridereau-Zins C
J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 88(12):1865-72. PubMed ID: 18235347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anorectal staging: is EUS necessary?
Cesmeli E
Minerva Med; 2014 Oct; 105(5):423-36. PubMed ID: 25000219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Wong's classification improves the accuracy of rectal cancer staging by endorectal ultrasound and MRI.
Muñoz E; Granero-Castro P; Frasson M; Escartin J; Esclapez P; Campos S; Flor-Lorente B; Garcia-Granero E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Dec; 56(12):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24201386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Preoperative diagnostic procedures in locally advanced rectal carcinoma (> or =T3 or N+). What does endoluminal ultrasound achieve at staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy) in contrast to computed tomography?].
Liersch T; Langer C; Jakob C; Müller D; Ghadimi BM; Siemer A; Markus PM; Füzesi L; Becker H
Chirurg; 2003 Mar; 74(3):224-34. PubMed ID: 12647079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
Guo F; Ren J; Wang S; Dai W; Ma N
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic value before and following chemoradiation.
Maor Y; Nadler M; Barshack I; Zmora O; Koller M; Kundel Y; Fidder H; Bar-Meir S; Avidan B
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Feb; 21(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 16509874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of endoscopic ultrasound in staging rectal adenocarcinoma appropriate for primary surgical resection.
Ahuja NK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; White GE; Zabolotsky A; Koons A; Leung W; Sarkaria S; Kahaleh M; Waxman I; Siddiqui AA; Shami VM
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Feb; 13(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 25019698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer.
Fuchsjäger MH; Maier AG; Schima W; Zebedin E; Herbst F; Mittlböck M; Wrba F; Lechner GL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 12876020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in staging and restaging patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Marone P; de Bellis M; Avallone A; Delrio P; di Nardo G; D'Angelo V; Tatangelo F; Pecori B; Di Girolamo E; Iaffaioli V; Lastoria S; Battista Rossi G
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2011 Oct; 35(10):666-70. PubMed ID: 21782549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting residual rectal adenocarcinoma in the surgical specimen after preoperative brachytherapy with endoscopic ultrasound.
Romagnuolo J; Parent J; Vuong T; Bélanger M; Michel RP; Belliveau PJ; Trudel JL
Can J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jul; 18(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 15229745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
