989 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21803564)
1. Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output.
Picot M; Lapinsonnière L; Rothballer M; Barrière F
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Oct; 28(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 21803564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.
Nevin KP; Richter H; Covalla SF; Johnson JP; Woodard TL; Orloff AL; Jia H; Zhang M; Lovley DR
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 10(10):2505-14. PubMed ID: 18564184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The study of electrochemically active microbial biofilms on different carbon-based anode materials in microbial fuel cells.
Liu Y; Harnisch F; Fricke K; Schröder U; Climent V; Feliu JM
Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 May; 25(9):2167-71. PubMed ID: 20189793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved fuel cell and electrode designs for producing electricity from microbial degradation.
Park DH; Zeikus JG
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Feb; 81(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 12474258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Power production enhancement with a polyaniline modified anode in microbial fuel cells.
Lai B; Tang X; Li H; Du Z; Liu X; Zhang Q
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Oct; 28(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 21820889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous power generation and microbial community structure of the anode biofilms in a three-stage microbial fuel cell system.
Chung K; Okabe S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 83(5):965-77. PubMed ID: 19404637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spontaneous modification of graphite anode by anthraquinone-2-sulfonic acid for microbial fuel cells.
Tang X; Li H; Du Z; Ng HY
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jul; 164():184-8. PubMed ID: 24859209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of redox polymer and enzyme co-immobilization on carbon electrodes to provide membrane-less glucose/O2 enzymatic fuel cells with improved power output and stability.
Rengaraj S; Kavanagh P; Leech D
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Dec; 30(1):294-9. PubMed ID: 22005596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of surface charge and hydrophobicity on anodic biofilm formation, community composition, and current generation in bioelectrochemical systems.
Guo K; Freguia S; Dennis PG; Chen X; Donose BC; Keller J; Gooding JJ; Rabaey K
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 47(13):7563-70. PubMed ID: 23745742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spontaneous modification of carbon surface with neutral red from its diazonium salts for bioelectrochemical systems.
Guo K; Chen X; Freguia S; Donose BC
Biosens Bioelectron; 2013 Sep; 47():184-9. PubMed ID: 23578972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of nitrogen addition on the performance of microbial fuel cell anodes.
Saito T; Mehanna M; Wang X; Cusick RD; Feng Y; Hickner MA; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):395-8. PubMed ID: 20889061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Checking graphite and stainless anodes with an experimental model of marine microbial fuel cell.
Dumas C; Mollica A; Féron D; Basseguy R; Etcheverry L; Bergel A
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8887-94. PubMed ID: 18558485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced electrode-reducing rate during the enrichment process in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.
Ishii S; Logan BE; Sekiguchi Y
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 May; 94(4):1087-94. PubMed ID: 22223104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating microbial fuel cell bioanode performance under different cathode conditions.
Borole AP; Hamilton CY; Aaron DS; Tsouris C
Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(6):1630-6. PubMed ID: 19731337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conductive artificial biofilm dramatically enhances bioelectricity production in Shewanella-inoculated microbial fuel cells.
Yu YY; Chen HL; Yong YC; Kim DH; Song H
Chem Commun (Camb); 2011 Dec; 47(48):12825-7. PubMed ID: 22048750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
Commault AS; Lear G; Packer MA; Weld RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():226-34. PubMed ID: 23665518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carbon nanotube powders as electrode modifier to enhance the activity of anodic biofilm in microbial fuel cells.
Liang P; Wang H; Xia X; Huang X; Mo Y; Cao X; Fan M
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Feb; 26(6):3000-4. PubMed ID: 21190836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of initial biofilm growth on the anode impedance of microbial fuel cells.
Ramasamy RP; Ren Z; Mench MM; Regan JM
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep; 101(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 18646217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microtoming coupled to microarray analysis to evaluate the spatial metabolic status of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
Franks AE; Nevin KP; Glaven RH; Lovley DR
ISME J; 2010 Apr; 4(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 20033069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phenol-degrading anode biofilm with high coulombic efficiency in graphite electrodes microbial fuel cell.
Zhang D; Li Z; Zhang C; Zhou X; Xiao Z; Awata T; Katayama A
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Mar; 123(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 27979700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
