991 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21803564)
21. Stability characterization and modeling of robust distributed benthic microbial fuel cell (DBMFC) system.
Karra U; Huang G; Umaz R; Tenaglier C; Wang L; Li B
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():477-84. PubMed ID: 23890975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A μL-scale micromachined microbial fuel cell having high power density.
Choi S; Lee HS; Yang Y; Parameswaran P; Torres CI; Rittmann BE; Chae J
Lab Chip; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 21311808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Power overshoot in two-chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC).
Nien PC; Lee CY; Ho KC; Adav SS; Liu L; Wang A; Ren N; Lee DJ
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4742-6. PubMed ID: 21295969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of the Pt loading side and cathode-biofilm on the performance of a membrane-less and single-chamber microbial fuel cell.
Yang S; Jia B; Liu H
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1197-202. PubMed ID: 18790635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance and microbial ecology of air-cathode microbial fuel cells with layered electrode assemblies.
Butler CS; Nerenberg R
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 May; 86(5):1399-408. PubMed ID: 20098985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of Enterobacter aerogenes fuel cells: from in situ biohydrogen oxidization to direct electroactive biofilm.
Zhuang L; Zhou S; Yuan Y; Liu T; Wu Z; Cheng J
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 20598528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of conductive polymers coated anode on the performance of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) and its biodiversity analysis.
Li C; Zhang L; Ding L; Ren H; Cui H
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Jun; 26(10):4169-76. PubMed ID: 21549585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells.
Yi H; Nevin KP; Kim BC; Franks AE; Klimes A; Tender LM; Lovley DR
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Aug; 24(12):3498-503. PubMed ID: 19487117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of formation of biofilms and chemical scale on the cathode electrode on the performance of a continuous two-chamber microbial fuel cell.
Chung K; Fujiki I; Okabe S
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):355-60. PubMed ID: 20923722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrochemical characterization of anodic biofilms enriched with glucose and acetate in single-chamber microbial fuel cells.
Yuan Y; Zhou S; Xu N; Zhuang L
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2011 Feb; 82(2):641-6. PubMed ID: 21050727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does bioelectrochemical cell configuration and anode potential affect biofilm response?
Kumar A; Katuri K; Lens P; Leech D
Biochem Soc Trans; 2012 Dec; 40(6):1308-14. PubMed ID: 23176473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electricity generation using membrane and salt bridge microbial fuel cells.
Min B; Cheng S; Logan BE
Water Res; 2005 May; 39(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 15899266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterization of microbial fuel cells at microbially and electrochemically meaningful time scales.
Ren Z; Yan H; Wang W; Mench MM; Regan JM
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2435-41. PubMed ID: 21329346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improved performance of membrane free single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells with nitric acid and ethylenediamine surface modified activated carbon fiber felt anodes.
Zhu N; Chen X; Zhang T; Wu P; Li P; Wu J
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):422-6. PubMed ID: 20594833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization.
Torres CI; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Parameswaran P; Marcus AK; Wanger G; Gorby YA; Rittmann BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9519-24. PubMed ID: 20000550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Proton exchange membrane and electrode surface areas as factors that affect power generation in microbial fuel cells.
Oh SE; Logan BE
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 70(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 16167143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Electrocatalytic activity of anodic biofilm responses to pH changes in microbial fuel cells.
Yuan Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Zhong S; Zhuang L
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(13):6887-91. PubMed ID: 21530241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of anodic biofilm growth on bioelectricity production in single chambered mediatorless microbial fuel cell using mixed anaerobic consortia.
Venkata Mohan S; Veer Raghavulu S; Sarma PN
Biosens Bioelectron; 2008 Sep; 24(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18440217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrochemical surface modification of carbon mesh anode to improve the performance of air-cathode microbial fuel cells.
Luo J; Chi M; Wang H; He H; Zhou M
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2013 Dec; 36(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 23670635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microbial fuel cells: the effects of configurations, electrolyte solutions, and electrode materials on power generation.
Li F; Sharma Y; Lei Y; Li B; Zhou Q
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 160(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 19172235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
