89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21803663)
1. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: eliciting preference of performers and colleagues via conjoint analysis.
Twijnstra AR; Stiggelbout AM; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 21803663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists.
Englund M; Robson S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 17980333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.
Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy--a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists.
Persson P; Hellborg T; Brynhildsen J; Fredrikson M; Kjølhede P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 19241224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 23312244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Innovations in surgery: the role of residents in the implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Pijnenborg JM; ter Haar JF
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Sep; 21(7):615-9. PubMed ID: 21612451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of vesicourethral function after laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without vaginal cuff suspension.
Long CY; Liu CM; Wu TP; Hsu SC; Chang Y; Tsai EM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 15904617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes toward mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among German gynecologists.
David M; Wild D; Wernecke KD; Siedentopf F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 22765973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: results of a randomized trial.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Siesto G; Uccella S; Boni L; Serati M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 21640669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.
Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Mol BW; Bongers MY; Bremer GL; de Vet HC; Vierhout ME; Brolmann HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17368247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery.
Yeung PP; Bolden CR; Westreich D; Sobolewski C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 23312246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.
Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
