275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21803977)
1. Posterior cruciate ligament: anatomy, biomechanics, and outcomes.
Voos JE; Mauro CS; Wente T; Warren RF; Wickiewicz TL
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):222-31. PubMed ID: 21803977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Cooper DE; Stewart D
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How well do anatomical reconstructions of the posterolateral corner restore varus stability to the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee?
Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1117-22. PubMed ID: 17581975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinematics of the posterior cruciate ligament/posterolateral corner-injured knee after reconstruction by single- and double-bundle intra-articular grafts.
Wiley WB; Askew MJ; Melby A; Noe DA
Am J Sports Med; 2006 May; 34(5):741-8. PubMed ID: 16382008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.
Markolf KL; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 20348284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Campbell RB; Jordan SS; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1356.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18063182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advances in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Levy BA; Fanelli GC; Miller MD; Stuart MJ
Instr Course Lect; 2015; 64():543-54. PubMed ID: 25745937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: a comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction.
Wijdicks CA; Kennedy NI; Goldsmith MT; Devitt BM; Michalski MP; Årøen A; Engebretsen L; LaPrade RF
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2839-48. PubMed ID: 24092043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emerging Updates on the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Review of the Current Literature.
LaPrade CM; Civitarese DM; Rasmussen MT; LaPrade RF
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Dec; 43(12):3077-92. PubMed ID: 25776184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques.
Bergfeld JA; Graham SM; Parker RD; Valdevit AD; Kambic HE
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Jul; 33(7):976-81. PubMed ID: 15888712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current concepts review: the posterior cruciate ligament.
Fanelli GC; Beck JD; Edson CJ
J Knee Surg; 2010 Jun; 23(2):61-72. PubMed ID: 21141682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces.
Margheritini F; Mauro CS; Rihn JA; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD
Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Harner CD; Janaushek MA; Kanamori A; Yagi M; Vogrin TM; Woo SL
Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 10750988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Gadikota HR; Seon JK; Kozanek M; Oh LS; Gill TJ; Montgomery KD; Li G
Am J Sports Med; 2009 May; 37(5):962-9. PubMed ID: 19261901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative laxity measurements using a navigation system in anatomical double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Kimura Y; Tsuda E; Hiraga Y; Yamamoto Y; Maeda S; Ishibashi Y
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Oct; 23(10):3085-93. PubMed ID: 25377192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited.
Wind WM; Bergfeld JA; Parker RD
Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(7):1765-75. PubMed ID: 15494347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of femoral tunnel position on graft forces during inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(5):667-72. PubMed ID: 12975184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique.
Kim SJ; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kung YP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():145-57. PubMed ID: 20844171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Stannard JP; Temperato J; Stannard JT
J Knee Surg; 2021 May; 34(6):582-586. PubMed ID: 33580487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
