241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21803985)
1. Mammography and ultrasound imaging of preinvasive and invasive canine spontaneous mammary cancer and their similarities to human breast cancer.
Mohammed SI; Meloni GB; Pinna Parpaglia ML; Marras V; Burrai GP; Meloni F; Pirino S; Antuofermo E
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2011 Nov; 4(11):1790-8. PubMed ID: 21803985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer.
Wang X; Xu P; Wang Y; Grant EG
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 21498359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications.
Gufler H; Buitrago-Téllez CH; Madjar H; Allmann KH; Uhl M; Rohr-Reyes A
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10866074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.
Ko E; Han W; Lee JW; Cho J; Kim EK; Jung SY; Kang MJ; Moon WK; Park IA; Kim SW; Kim KS; Lee ES; Min KH; Kim SW; Noh DY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Nov; 112(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 18060577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of probably benign lesions in non-screening breast diagnostics.
Kapsimalakou S; Waldmann A; Katalinic A; Grande-Nagel I; Fischer D; Barkhausen J; Vogt FM
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 24722993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: mammographic and US features.
Kim MJ; Kim EK; Oh KK; Park BW; Kim H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16891081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spontaneous mammary intraepithelial lesions in dogs--a model of breast cancer.
Antuofermo E; Miller MA; Pirino S; Xie J; Badve S; Mohammed SI
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Nov; 16(11):2247-56. PubMed ID: 17982119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive predictive value of breast cancer in the lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 5.
Wiratkapun C; Lertsithichai P; Wibulpholprasert B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89(8):1253-9. PubMed ID: 17048437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy--success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADSTM-correlated indication].
Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Fischmann A; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12525989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy in estimating tumor extension according to mammographic subtypes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Sato M; Fukutomi T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Miyakawa K; Yamamoto N; Hasegawa T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 May; 32(5):157-61. PubMed ID: 12110641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are the criteria of Tabar and Dean still relevant to radial scar?
Bouté V; Goyat I; Denoux Y; Lacroix J; Marie B; Michels JJ
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 16962279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mucocele-like tumors of the breast as cystic lesions: sonographic-pathologic correlation.
Kim SM; Kim HH; Kang DK; Shin HJ; Cho N; Park JM; Cha JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1424-30. PubMed ID: 21606308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous large-core biopsy of papillary breast lesions.
Liberman L; Bracero N; Vuolo MA; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 9930777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
