136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2180422)
1. [The quantitative recovery of microbes during testing of disinfectants for instruments].
Höller C; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Feb; 189(4):300-11. PubMed ID: 2180422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Testing a disinfectant used for chemothermic disinfection (author's transl)].
Eigener U
Prakt Anaesth; 1975 Feb; 10(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 823538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The effectiveness of disinfectants from kinetic viewpoints].
Hunger W; Höller C; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):154-76. PubMed ID: 2118355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different drying conditions for the viability of Candida albicans present on carriers.
Röhm-Rodowald E; Chojecka A; Jakimiak B; Wiercińska O; Ziemba B; Kanclerski K
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2014; 65(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 24964579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Methodologic problems in the bacteriological laboratory testing of disinfectants for surface disinfection in veterinary medicine].
Kleiner U; Trenner P
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1988 May; 186(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 3138832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quantitative recovery of bacteria from different germ carrier materials].
Hunger W; Höller C; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 2118354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacterial contamination of keyboards: efficacy and functional impact of disinfectants.
Rutala WA; White MS; Gergen MF; Weber DJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 16622815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.
Yilmaz A; Kaleta EF
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009 May; 116(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 19462641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial effectiveness of 2% glutaraldehyde versus other disinfectants for hospital equipment, in an in vitro test based on germ-carriers with a high microbial contamination.
Herruzo-Cabrera R; Uriarte MC; Rey-Calero J
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1999 Dec; 100(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 10672649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of disinfectant efficacy when using high-volume directed mist application of accelerated hydrogen peroxide and peroxymonosulfate disinfectants in a large animal hospital.
Saklou NT; Burgess BA; Van Metre DC; Hornig KJ; Morley PS; Byers SR
Equine Vet J; 2016 Jul; 48(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 26101083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: bacterial attachment and surface texture.
Cole EC; Rutala WA; Carson JL
J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1987; 70(5):903-6. PubMed ID: 3119561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disinfectant evaluation by a capacity use-dilution test.
Bergan T; Lystad A
J Appl Bacteriol; 1971 Dec; 34(4):741-50. PubMed ID: 4947441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases.
Wilson LA; Sawant AD; Ahearn DG
Arch Ophthalmol; 1991 Aug; 109(8):1155-7. PubMed ID: 1867561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Methods for testing surface disinfection procedures under current conventional conditions].
Andenmatten R; Reber H
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Aug; 179(4):340-64. PubMed ID: 6395572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sporicidal activity of disinfectants as one possible cause for bacteria in patient-ready endoscopes.
Miner N; Harris V; Ebron T; Cao TD
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2007; 30(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 17724404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contaminated toothbrushes and their disinfection.
Caudry SD; Klitorinos A; Chan EC
J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 61(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 7614433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experimental microbiological research on instrument and denture disinfection with a disinfectant spray for dental practice and the use of patients. 1. The formulation of the problem and bacteriological studies].
Oehring H; Welker D; Musil R; Gruhn I; Otto U; Sprenger R
Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 2150255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the efficacy of a peroxygen disinfectant-filled footmat for reduction of bacterial load on footwear in a large animal hospital setting.
Dunowska M; Morley PS; Patterson G; Hyatt DR; Van Metre DC
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Jun; 228(12):1935-9. PubMed ID: 16784389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [In vitro antimicrobial activity of glutaraldehyde plus O-phenylphenol association (ratio 2:1)].
D'Ercole S; Catamo G; De Fazio P; Piccolomini R
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 11845118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing the assessment of the pseudomonacidal activity of disinfectants by a quantitative suspension test. II. The post-disinfection recovery of surviving organisms.
Reybrouck G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1977 Sep; 165(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 412351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
