These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21805167)

  • 1. A novel approach to quantify random error explicitly in epidemiological studies.
    Janszky I; Bjørngaard JH; Romundstad P; Vatten L
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 21805167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random error units, extension of a novel method to express random error in epidemiological studies.
    Janszky I; Bjørngaard JH; Romundstad P; Vatten L; Orsini N
    Clin Epidemiol; 2019; 11():127-132. PubMed ID: 30774447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surprise!
    Cole SR; Edwards JK; Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 190(2):191-193. PubMed ID: 32648906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses.
    Knuiman MW; Divitini ML; Buzas JS; Fitzgerald PE
    Ann Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 9465995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
    Huang TH; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Mitsuhashi T; Mansournia MA; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):788-793.e1. PubMed ID: 27771142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty beyond sampling error.
    Altman DG; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g7065. PubMed ID: 25424583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Apr; 5(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 20949126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative evaluation of multiplicity in epidemiology and public health research.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 147(7):615-9. PubMed ID: 9554599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Points of significance: error bars.
    Krzywinski M; Altman N
    Nat Methods; 2013 Oct; 10(10):921-2. PubMed ID: 24161969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive-a meta-epidemiological study.
    Koster TM; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Jakobsen JC; Kaufmann T; Eck RJ; Koster G; Hiemstra B; van der Horst ICC; Keus E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():1-10. PubMed ID: 31200004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for constructing a confidence bound for the actual error rate of a prediction rule in high dimensions.
    Dobbin KK
    Biostatistics; 2009 Apr; 10(2):282-96. PubMed ID: 19039030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of rate estimation under uniform interval censoring.
    Alexander N
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3442-5. PubMed ID: 18186539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
    Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sample selection in epidemiologic studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2002; 56(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 12608099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
    Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An epidemiological approach to quality assurance in the hospital.
    Everett WD
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1993; 18(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8444620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.