These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21805487)

  • 1. Bayesian information criterion for longitudinal and clustered data.
    Jones RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3050-6. PubMed ID: 21805487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of statistical selection strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models.
    Moses T; Holland PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):557-74. PubMed ID: 20030964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selecting the best unbalanced repeated measures model.
    Vallejo G; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE; Tuero-Herrero E
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 21287107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy.
    McGuire JA; Witt CC; Altshuler DL; Remsen JV
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):837-56. PubMed ID: 17934998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameter recovery and model selection in mixed Rasch models.
    Preinerstorfer D; Formann AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):251-62. PubMed ID: 21675964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative investigation on subspace dimension determination.
    Hu X; Xu L
    Neural Netw; 2004; 17(8-9):1051-9. PubMed ID: 15555851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalized likelihood approach to estimate a smooth mean curve on longitudinal data.
    Jacqmin-Gadda H; Joly P; Commenges D; Binquet C; Chêne G
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(16):2391-402. PubMed ID: 12210623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models.
    Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Behav Genet; 2004 Nov; 34(6):593-610. PubMed ID: 15520516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified Bayes information criterion with applications to the analysis of comparative genomic hybridization data.
    Zhang NR; Siegmund DO
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 17447926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model comparison of generalized linear mixed models.
    Song XY; Lee SY
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(10):1685-98. PubMed ID: 16220521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
    Vrieze SI
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the performance of AIC in selecting phylogenetic models.
    Jhwueng DC; Huzurbazar S; O'Meara BC; Liu L
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Aug; 13(4):459-75. PubMed ID: 24867284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting a linear mixed model for longitudinal data: repeated measures analysis of variance, covariance pattern model, and growth curve approaches.
    Liu S; Rovine MJ; Molenaar PC
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 22251268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complexity vs. simplicity: groundwater model ranking using information criteria.
    Engelhardt I; De Aguinaga JG; Mikat H; Schüth C; Liedl R
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(4):573-83. PubMed ID: 23750914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hazard regression with interval-censored data.
    Kooperberg C; Clarkson DB
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1485-94. PubMed ID: 9423263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
    Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria.
    Dziak JJ; Coffman DL; Lanza ST; Li R; Jermiin LS
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 Mar; 21(2):553-565. PubMed ID: 30895308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of repeatability and multiple trait threshold models for litter size in sheep using observed and simulated data in Bayesian analyses.
    Mekkawy W; Roehe R; Lewis RM; Davies MH; Bünger L; Simm G; Haresign W
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Aug; 127(4):261-71. PubMed ID: 20646113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.