These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21805493)

  • 21. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex difference in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant social information: an event-related potential study of familiar face recognition.
    Wang J; Kitayama S; Han S
    Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 1408():41-51. PubMed ID: 21767827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.
    Ishai A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Feb; 63(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 16759727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition memory for emotional and neutral faces: an event-related potential study.
    Johansson M; Mecklinger A; Treese AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 16(10):1840-53. PubMed ID: 15701233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the way people look to judge their intentions.
    Debruille JB; Brodeur MB; Hess U
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):533-43. PubMed ID: 21668105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The light-makeup advantage in facial processing: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Tagai K; Shimakura H; Isobe H; Nittono H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172489. PubMed ID: 28234959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How facial attractiveness affects sustained attention.
    Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 57(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 27347672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Judging the health and attractiveness of female faces: is the most attractive level of facial adiposity also considered the healthiest?
    Coetzee V; Re D; Perrett DI; Tiddeman BP; Xiao D
    Body Image; 2011 Mar; 8(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 21354874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A bi-prototype theory of facial attractiveness.
    Chang F; Chou CH
    Neural Comput; 2009 Mar; 21(3):890-910. PubMed ID: 18928365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preadolescents' recognition of faces of unfamiliar peers: the effect of attractiveness of faces.
    Mallet P; Lallemand N
    J Genet Psychol; 2003 Dec; 164(4):453-71. PubMed ID: 14719778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition.
    Gosling A; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2736-45. PubMed ID: 21679721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fearful faces impact in peripheral vision: behavioral and neural evidence.
    Rigoulot S; D'Hondt F; Defoort-Dhellemmes S; Despretz P; Honoré J; Sequeira H
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2013-21. PubMed ID: 21453712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory.
    Schacht A; Werheid K; Sommer W
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 8(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 18589504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity.
    Tanaka JW; Curran T; Porterfield AL; Collins D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1488-97. PubMed ID: 16989550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Different time courses of event-related potentials in spatial search for emotionally loaded faces.
    Tang Y; Li Y; Wang J; Zhu Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 19732798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An event-related potential study on the early processing of crying faces.
    Hendriks MC; van Boxtel GJ; Vingerhoets AJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 May; 18(7):631-4. PubMed ID: 17426588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Configurational factors in the perception of faces and non-facial objects: an ERP study.
    Ishizu T; Ayabe T; Kojima S
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 118(7):955-66. PubMed ID: 18569153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.