124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2180577)
1. Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography.
Murdock CJ; Davis MJ; Ireland MA; Gibbons FA; Cope GD
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Mar; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 2180577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: a comparison with iopamidol and urografin.
Tani M; Handa S; Noma S; Kojima S; Miyamori R; Miyazaki T; Yoshino H; Ohnishi S; Yamazaki H; Nakamura Y
Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 4036787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study.
Folke K; Andrew E; Laulund S; Hansen PF
Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J
Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media].
Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative trial of iohexol 350, a non-ionic contrast medium, with diatrizoate (Urografin 370) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
Sullivan ID; Wainwright RJ; Reidy JF; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1984 Jun; 51(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 6375703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison.
Fattori R; Piva R; Schicchi F; Pancrazi A; Gabrielli G; Marzocchi A; Piovaccari G; Blandini A; Magnani B
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 8020520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in left ventricular angiography and in coronary angiography.
Dyet JF; Carter EC; Hartley WC
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):700-5. PubMed ID: 2205329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ionized calcium levels in coronary sinus blood during coronary angiography: effects of four contrast media.
Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Monji T; Uwatoko H; Kitamura K; Abe M
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):159-61. PubMed ID: 1549664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic adverse effects of contrast media in coronary angiography].
Wagner J; Zwicker B
Z Kardiol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 8165845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography].
Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Pavlov NA
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
Ahlgren P
Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between a low-osmolar ionic (ioxaglate) and a low-osmolar non-ionic (iopamidol) contrast agent in cardiac imaging.
Scholtz ME; Svatos VJ; Myburgh DP
S Afr Med J; 1988 Feb; 73(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 3340942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography.
Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
Cooper MW; Reed PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
