These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2180634)

  • 1. Uniformity of current density under stimulating electrodes.
    Kim Y; Zieber HG; Wang FE
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1990; 17(6):585-619. PubMed ID: 2180634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the current-density distribution from a tapered, gelled-pad external cardiac pacing electrode.
    Williams CR; Geddes LA; Bourland JD; Furgason ES
    Med Instrum; 1987 Dec; 21(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 3431497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical current distribution under transthoracic defibrillation and pacing electrodes.
    Papazov S; Kostov Z; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11924843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analyses of uniform current density electrodes for radio-frequency cardiac ablation.
    Tungjitkusolmun S; Woo EJ; Cao H; Tsai JZ; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jan; 47(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 10646277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro measurement and characterization of current density profiles produced by non-recessed, simple recessed, and radially varying recessed stimulating electrodes.
    Suesserman MF; Spelman FA; Rubinstein JT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 May; 38(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 1874521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current distribution under electrodes in relation to stimulation current and skin blood flow: are modern electrodes really providing the current distribution during stimulation we believe they are?
    Petrofsky J; Schwab E; CĂșneo M; George J; Kim J; Almalty A; Lawson D; Johnson E; Remigo W
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(6):368-81. PubMed ID: 17060165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of cardiac defibrillation by three-dimensional finite element modeling of the human thorax.
    Panescu D; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ; Stratbucker RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Feb; 42(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 7868146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 3-D SAR model for current source interstitial hyperthermia.
    de Bree J; van der Koijk JF; Lagendijk JJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Oct; 43(10):1038-45. PubMed ID: 9214821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Higher currents, greater risks: preventing patient burns at the return-electrode site during high-current electrosurgical procedures.
    ECRI
    Health Devices; 2005 Aug; 34(8):273-9. PubMed ID: 16255231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A minimum profile uniform current density electrode.
    Ksienski DA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):682-92. PubMed ID: 1516935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of the impedance of a thin hydrogel electrode on sensation during functional electrical stimulation.
    Sha N; Kenney LP; Heller BW; Barker AT; Howard D; Wang W
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17942361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid assessment of electrode characteristics for impedance imaging.
    Newell JC; Isaacson D; Gisser DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):735-8. PubMed ID: 2394462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo 3-D distributions of electric fields in pig skin with rectangular pulse electrical current stimulation (RPECS).
    Cheng K; Tarjan PP; Thio YC; Mertz PM
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 8891184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-channel stimulator and electrode array providing a rotating current whirlpool for electrical stimulation of wounds.
    Petrofsky J; Suh HJ; Fish A; Hernandez V; Abdo A; Collins K; Mendoza E; Yang TN
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 18821415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal electrode designs for electrosurgery, defibrillation, and external cardiac pacing.
    Kim Y; Fahy JB; Tupper BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 Sep; 33(9):845-53. PubMed ID: 3759115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [About optimized designs and circuits of autonomous electric stimulators for the gastrointestinal tract].
    Glushchuk SF
    Med Tekh; 2004; (6):34-8. PubMed ID: 15656414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring instrumentation. Isolated inputs, electrosurgery filtering, burns protection: what does it mean?
    Uyttendaele K; Grobstein S; Svetz P
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1978; 29(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 751436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes.
    North RB; Kidd DH; Olin JC; Sieracki JM
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Aug; 51(2):381-9; discussion 389-90. PubMed ID: 12182776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pacemaker interference by 60-Hz contact currents.
    Dawson TW; Caputa K; Stuchly MA; Kavet R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Aug; 49(8):878-86. PubMed ID: 12148827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.