122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2180634)
1. Uniformity of current density under stimulating electrodes.
Kim Y; Zieber HG; Wang FE
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1990; 17(6):585-619. PubMed ID: 2180634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the current-density distribution from a tapered, gelled-pad external cardiac pacing electrode.
Williams CR; Geddes LA; Bourland JD; Furgason ES
Med Instrum; 1987 Dec; 21(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 3431497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
Wei XF; Grill WM
J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical current distribution under transthoracic defibrillation and pacing electrodes.
Papazov S; Kostov Z; Daskalov I
J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11924843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analyses of uniform current density electrodes for radio-frequency cardiac ablation.
Tungjitkusolmun S; Woo EJ; Cao H; Tsai JZ; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jan; 47(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 10646277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro measurement and characterization of current density profiles produced by non-recessed, simple recessed, and radially varying recessed stimulating electrodes.
Suesserman MF; Spelman FA; Rubinstein JT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 May; 38(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 1874521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current distribution under electrodes in relation to stimulation current and skin blood flow: are modern electrodes really providing the current distribution during stimulation we believe they are?
Petrofsky J; Schwab E; Cúneo M; George J; Kim J; Almalty A; Lawson D; Johnson E; Remigo W
J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(6):368-81. PubMed ID: 17060165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of cardiac defibrillation by three-dimensional finite element modeling of the human thorax.
Panescu D; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ; Stratbucker RA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Feb; 42(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 7868146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 3-D SAR model for current source interstitial hyperthermia.
de Bree J; van der Koijk JF; Lagendijk JJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Oct; 43(10):1038-45. PubMed ID: 9214821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Higher currents, greater risks: preventing patient burns at the return-electrode site during high-current electrosurgical procedures.
ECRI
Health Devices; 2005 Aug; 34(8):273-9. PubMed ID: 16255231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A minimum profile uniform current density electrode.
Ksienski DA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):682-92. PubMed ID: 1516935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the impedance of a thin hydrogel electrode on sensation during functional electrical stimulation.
Sha N; Kenney LP; Heller BW; Barker AT; Howard D; Wang W
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17942361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid assessment of electrode characteristics for impedance imaging.
Newell JC; Isaacson D; Gisser DG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):735-8. PubMed ID: 2394462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo 3-D distributions of electric fields in pig skin with rectangular pulse electrical current stimulation (RPECS).
Cheng K; Tarjan PP; Thio YC; Mertz PM
Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 8891184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multi-channel stimulator and electrode array providing a rotating current whirlpool for electrical stimulation of wounds.
Petrofsky J; Suh HJ; Fish A; Hernandez V; Abdo A; Collins K; Mendoza E; Yang TN
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 18821415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal electrode designs for electrosurgery, defibrillation, and external cardiac pacing.
Kim Y; Fahy JB; Tupper BJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 Sep; 33(9):845-53. PubMed ID: 3759115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [About optimized designs and circuits of autonomous electric stimulators for the gastrointestinal tract].
Glushchuk SF
Med Tekh; 2004; (6):34-8. PubMed ID: 15656414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring instrumentation. Isolated inputs, electrosurgery filtering, burns protection: what does it mean?
Uyttendaele K; Grobstein S; Svetz P
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1978; 29(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 751436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes.
North RB; Kidd DH; Olin JC; Sieracki JM
Neurosurgery; 2002 Aug; 51(2):381-9; discussion 389-90. PubMed ID: 12182776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pacemaker interference by 60-Hz contact currents.
Dawson TW; Caputa K; Stuchly MA; Kavet R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Aug; 49(8):878-86. PubMed ID: 12148827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
