BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21807505)

  • 1. On-field study of anaerobic digestion full-scale plants (Part II): new approaches in monitoring and evaluating process efficiency.
    Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Orzi V; Adani F
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Oct; 102(19):8814-9. PubMed ID: 21807505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On-field study of anaerobic digestion full-scale plants (part I): an on-field methodology to determine mass, carbon and nutrients balance.
    Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Salati S; Adani F
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Sep; 102(17):7737-44. PubMed ID: 21715157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.
    Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the degradation efficiency of full-scale biogas plants: A comparative study of degradation indicators.
    Li C; Nges IA; Lu W; Wang H
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 244(Pt 1):304-312. PubMed ID: 28780264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anaerobic co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste with FOG waste from a sewage treatment plant: recovering a wasted methane potential and enhancing the biogas yield.
    Martín-González L; Colturato LF; Font X; Vicent T
    Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1854-9. PubMed ID: 20400285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of increasing energy crop addition on process performance and residual methane potential in anaerobic digestion.
    Lindorfer H; Pérez López C; Resch C; Braun R; Kirchmayr R
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):55-63. PubMed ID: 18048977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full-stream and part-stream ultrasound treatment effect on sludge anaerobic digestion.
    Pérez-Elvira SI; Ferreira LC; Donoso-Bravo A; Fdz-Polanco M; Fdz-Polanco F
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1363-72. PubMed ID: 20351414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing centralised and decentralised anaerobic digestion of stillage from a large-scale bioethanol plant to animal feed production.
    Drosg B; Wirthensohn T; Konrad G; Hornbachner D; Resch C; Wäger F; Loderer C; Waltenberger R; Kirchmayr R; Braun R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1483-9. PubMed ID: 18957763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level: is it economically feasible under conditions in Sweden?
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Dec; 28(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 16172872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency and biotechnological aspects of biogas production from microalgal substrates.
    Klassen V; Blifernez-Klassen O; Wobbe L; Schlüter A; Kruse O; Mussgnug JH
    J Biotechnol; 2016 Sep; 234():7-26. PubMed ID: 27449486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit of sodium hydroxide pretreatment of ensiled sorghum forage on the anaerobic reactor stability and methane production.
    Sambusiti C; Ficara E; Malpei F; Steyer JP; Carrère H
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():149-55. PubMed ID: 23867533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State estimation for anaerobic digesters using the ADM1.
    Gaida D; Wolf C; Meyer C; Stuhlsatz A; Lippel J; Bäck T; Bongards M; McLoone S
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(5):1088-95. PubMed ID: 22797239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of operating conditions and reactor configuration on efficiency of full-scale biogas plants.
    Angelidaki I; Boe K; Ellegaard L
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16180427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes.
    Alvarez JA; Otero L; Lema JM
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Feb; 101(4):1153-8. PubMed ID: 19833510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alkali pretreatment enhances biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper sludge.
    Lin Y; Wang D; Wu S; Wang C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):366-73. PubMed ID: 19464792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of dairy manure in pilot plant for biogas production: residual methane yield of digestate.
    Rico C; Rico JL; Tejero I; Muñoz N; Gómez B
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):2167-73. PubMed ID: 21612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of methanogenic activity of biogas plant slurry for monitoring codigestion of ossein factory wastes and cyanobacterial biomass.
    Chellapandi P; Prabaharan D; Uma L
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 162(2):524-35. PubMed ID: 19911119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production.
    Brown D; Shi J; Li Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Nov; 124():379-86. PubMed ID: 22995169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production.
    Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2537-41. PubMed ID: 19254824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.