These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21807536)

  • 1. Implicit attentional orienting in a target detection task with central cues.
    Peterson SA; Gibson TN
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1532-47. PubMed ID: 21807536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional orienting and awareness: evidence from a discrimination task.
    López-Ramón MF; Chica AB; Bartolomeo P; Lupiáñez J
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):745-55. PubMed ID: 21353598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence of strategic effects in the modulation of orienting of attention.
    Nougier V; Rossi B; Alain C; Taddei F
    Ergonomics; 1996 Sep; 39(9):1119-33. PubMed ID: 8681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
    Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The proportion valid effect in covert orienting: strategic control or implicit learning?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):432-42. PubMed ID: 20189414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trait anxiety reduces implicit expectancy during target spatial probability cueing.
    Berggren N; Derakshan N
    Emotion; 2013 Apr; 13(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 23046457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modulations of the visual N1 component of event-related potentials by central and peripheral cueing.
    Doallo S; Lorenzo-López L; Vizoso C; Holguín SR; Amenedo E; Bará S; Cadaveira F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Apr; 116(4):807-20. PubMed ID: 15792890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endogenous-like orienting of visual attention in rats.
    Marote CF; Xavier GF
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jul; 14(4):535-44. PubMed ID: 21369759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
    Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cueing spatial attention through timing and probability.
    Girardi G; Antonucci G; Nico D
    Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 21982581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention after central nonpredictive cues.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Zorzi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):745-59. PubMed ID: 18578597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orienting of visual attention among persons with autism spectrum disorders: reading versus responding to symbolic cues.
    Landry O; Mitchell PL; Burack JA
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2009 Jul; 50(7):862-70. PubMed ID: 19527316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of implicit attentional learning and habituation on inhibition of return.
    Wolf K; Ebeling D; Müller NG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 19304594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit sequence learning and contextual cueing do not compete for central cognitive resources.
    Jiménez L; Vázquez GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):222-35. PubMed ID: 20731503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problems inhibiting attentional capture by irrelevant stimuli in patients with frontotemporal dementia.
    Piquard A; Lacomblez L; Derouesné C; Siéroff E
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Jun; 70(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 19162388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: a qualitative difference approach.
    Vaquero JM; Fiacconi C; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1342-57. PubMed ID: 21038991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.