129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21807547)
1. Non contact method for in vivo assessment of skin mechanical properties for assessing effect of ageing.
Boyer G; Pailler Mattei C; Molimard J; Pericoi M; Laquieze S; Zahouani H
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Mar; 34(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 21807547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects.
Boyer G; Laquièze L; Le Bot A; Laquièze S; Zahouani H
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19152580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests.
Zahouani H; Pailler-Mattei C; Sohm B; Vargiolu R; Cenizo V; Debret R
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 19152581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo skin biophysical behaviour and surface topography as a function of ageing.
Pailler-Mattei C; Debret R; Vargiolu R; Sommer P; Zahouani H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():474-83. PubMed ID: 23664827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo mechanical characterization of human facial skin combining curved surface imaging and indentation techniques.
Dai A; Wang S; Zhou L; Wei H; Wang Z; He W
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 30070734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental and computational analysis of soft tissue stiffness in forearm using a manual indentation device.
Iivarinen JT; Korhonen RK; Julkunen P; Jurvelin JS
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1245-53. PubMed ID: 21696992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of diabetic wounds with optical coherence tomography-based air-jet indentation system and a material testing system.
Choi MC; Cheung KK; Ng GY; Zheng YP; Cheing GL
J Wound Care; 2015 Nov; 24(11):519, 522-4, 526-8. PubMed ID: 26551644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between the Young's modulus of the stratum corneum and age: a pilot study.
Hara Y; Masuda Y; Hirao T; Yoshikawa N
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Aug; 19(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 23551131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test method for mechanical properties of implantable catheters according to DIN 10555-3.
Busch JD; Schröder H; Sellenschloh K; Adam G; Ittrich H; Huber G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jun; 82():183-186. PubMed ID: 29605811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alteration of skin mechanics by thin polymer films.
Jachowicz J; McMullen R; Prettypaul D
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 19159377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Material properties in unconfined compression of gelatin hydrogel for skin tissue engineering applications.
Karimi A; Navidbakhsh M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Dec; 59(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 24988278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of indentation of a sample equine bone using finite element simulation and single cycle reference point indentation.
Hoffseth K; Randall C; Hansma P; Yang HT
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():282-91. PubMed ID: 25528690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and reliability of a hand-held in vivo skin indentation device to assess skin elasticity.
Virén T; Iivarinen JT; Sarin JK; Harvima I; Mayrovitz HN
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2018 Apr; 40(2):134-140. PubMed ID: 29314077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the in-plane biomechanical properties of human skin using a finite element model updating approach combined with an optical full-field measurement on a new tensile device.
Boyer G; Molimard J; Ben Tkaya M; Zahouani H; Pericoi M; Avril S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Nov; 27():273-82. PubMed ID: 23867292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical properties study of SW480 cells based on AFM.
Liu X; Song Z; Qu Y; Wang G; Wang Z
Cell Biol Int; 2015 Aug; 39(8):972-7. PubMed ID: 25881744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests.
Pailler-Mattei C; Bec S; Zahouani H
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jun; 30(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 17869160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women.
Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M
Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 23889488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis--I. Non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials.
Lin DC; Dimitriadis EK; Horkay F
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):430-40. PubMed ID: 17536911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo.
Agache PG; Monneur C; Leveque JL; De Rigal J
Arch Dermatol Res; 1980; 269(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 7235730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex- and site-dependent variations in the thickness and mechanical properties of human skin in vivo.
Diridollou S; Black D; Lagarde JM; Gall Y; Berson M; Vabre V; Patat F; Vaillant L
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2000 Dec; 22(6):421-35. PubMed ID: 18503429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
