These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21807952)

  • 1. Found in translation: cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO; Ishii K; Ambady N; Rosen KS; Hallett KC
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1499-507. PubMed ID: 21807952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity based on thin slices of behavior: a cross-cultural comparison.
    Valentova J; Rieger G; Havlicek J; Linsenmeier JA; Bailey JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21879429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB; Macrae CN
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 18954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.
    Stern C; West TV; Jost JT; Rule NO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 23276275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.
    Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mating interest improves women's accuracy in judging male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO; Rosen KS; Slepian ML; Ambady N
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 21670428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments.
    Lick DJ; Johnson KL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):801-17. PubMed ID: 27281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in perceptions of gay men's sexual role preferences from facial cues.
    Tskhay KO; Re DE; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1615-20. PubMed ID: 24906820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation.
    Tskhay KO; Feriozzo MM; Rule NO
    Perception; 2013; 42(10):1090-4. PubMed ID: 24494440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polling the face: prediction and consensus across cultures.
    Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB; Ozono H; Nakashima S; Yoshikawa S; Watabe M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jan; 98(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20053027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How women's sexual orientation guides accuracy of interpersonal judgements of other women.
    Ruben MA; Hill KM; Hall JA
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(8):1512-21. PubMed ID: 24564873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction of birth order, handedness, and sexual orientation in the Kinsey interview data.
    Bogaert AF; Blanchard R; Crosthwait LE
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 121(5):845-53. PubMed ID: 17907817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology.
    Johnson KL; Gill S; Reichman V; Tassinary LG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 17723051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of target and perceiver race in the categorisation of male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):830-9. PubMed ID: 22128555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.
    Ames DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):573-85. PubMed ID: 15535772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit and explicit measures of sexual orientation attitudes: in group preferences and related behaviors and beliefs among gay and straight men.
    Jellison WA; McConnell AR; Gabriel S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 May; 30(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 15107162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The careful balance of gender and sexuality: rural gay men, the heterosexual matrix, and "effeminophobia".
    Annes A; Redlin M
    J Homosex; 2012; 59(2):256-88. PubMed ID: 22335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internalized Homophobia Influences Perceptions of Men's Sexual Orientation from Photos of Their Faces.
    Tskhay KO; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Apr; 46(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 26525570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.