These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21810528)

  • 21. Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX(®): a population-based report from CAMOS.
    Leslie WD; Kovacs CS; Olszynski WP; Towheed T; Kaiser SM; Prior JC; Josse RG; Jamal SA; Kreiger N; Goltzman D;
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 21723768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures.
    Ahmed LA; Shigdel R; Joakimsen RM; Eldevik OP; Eriksen EF; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Bala Y; Zebaze R; Seeman E; Bjørnerem Å
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Aug; 26(8):2137-46. PubMed ID: 25876879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ADDING VFA TO DXA IDENTIFIES FRACTURE RISK IN A WAY NOT DUPLICATED BY OTHER MEASURES.
    Ginther JP; Ginther AW; Brodersen LD
    Endocr Pract; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1375-1378. PubMed ID: 29019717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The assessment of fracture risk.
    Unnanuntana A; Gladnick BP; Donnelly E; Lane JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):743-53. PubMed ID: 20194335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preoperative bone health assessment and optimization in spine surgery.
    Anderson PA; Kadri A; Hare KJ; Binkley N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E2. PubMed ID: 32738805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A study of the value of trabecular bone score in fracture risk assessment of postmenopausal women.
    Mirzaei A; Jahed SA; Nojomi M; Rajaei A; Zabihiyeganeh M
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 57(3):389-393. PubMed ID: 29880171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture as an independent predictor of incident fracture risk in older women and men in the Bone Microarchitecture International Consortium (BoMIC): a prospective study.
    Samelson EJ; Broe KE; Xu H; Yang L; Boyd S; Biver E; Szulc P; Adachi J; Amin S; Atkinson E; Berger C; Burt L; Chapurlat R; Chevalley T; Ferrari S; Goltzman D; Hanley DA; Hannan MT; Khosla S; Liu CT; Lorentzon M; Mellstrom D; Merle B; Nethander M; Rizzoli R; Sornay-Rendu E; Van Rietbergen B; Sundh D; Wong AKO; Ohlsson C; Demissie S; Kiel DP; Bouxsein ML
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2019 Jan; 7(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 30503163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
    Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
    Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of FRAX in clinical practice according to sex and osteoporosis definitions: the Manitoba BMD registry.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Johansson H; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Mar; 29(3):759-767. PubMed ID: 29404625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(®)) and determination of suitable cut-off values during primary screening in specific health check-ups in Japan.
    Nakatoh S; Takemaru Y
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2013 Nov; 31(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 23543192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
    Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The activity of a Spanish bone densitometry unit revisited under the point of view of FRAX.
    Gómez-Vaquero C; Bianchi M; Santo P; Roig-Vilaseca D; Narváez J; Nolla JM
    Reumatol Clin; 2012; 8(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 22608955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Agreement of Mexican FRAX with and without the value of bone mineral density in assessing the risk of fracture in daily clinical practice.
    Horta-Baas G; Pérez Bolde-Hernández A; Pérez-Pérez A; Vergara-Sánchez I; Romero-Figueroa MDS
    Med Clin (Barc); 2017 May; 148(9):387-393. PubMed ID: 28118961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Goal-directed treatment of osteoporosis in Europe.
    Kanis JA; McCloskey E; Branco J; Brandi ML; Dennison E; Devogelaer JP; Ferrari S; Kaufman JM; Papapoulos S; Reginster JY; Rizzoli R
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Nov; 25(11):2533-43. PubMed ID: 25199574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.
    Hans D; Downs RW; Duboeuf F; Greenspan S; Jankowski LG; Kiebzak GM; Petak SM;
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16731427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
    Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
    Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
    Bastos-Silva Y; Aguiar LB; Pinto-Neto AM; Baccaro LF; Costa-Paiva L
    Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():16. PubMed ID: 27067597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Goltzman D; Hanley DA; Adachi JD; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 21161509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and incident fractures in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
    Evenepoel P; Claes K; Meijers B; Laurent MR; Bammens B; Naesens M; Sprangers B; Pottel H; Cavalier E; Kuypers D
    Kidney Int; 2019 Jun; 95(6):1461-1470. PubMed ID: 30922664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.