199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21810621)
1. Ultimate masticatory force as a criterion in implant selection.
Demenko V; Linetskiy I; Nesvit K; Shevchenko A
J Dent Res; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1211-5. PubMed ID: 21810621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FE study of bone quality effect on load-carrying ability of dental implants.
Demenko V; Linetsky I; Nesvit V; Linetska L; Shevchenko A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(16):1751-61. PubMed ID: 23527468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants.
Kasai K; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 22442771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of Ti-6Al-4V and partially stabilized zirconia dental implant during clenching.
Choi AH; Matinlinna JP; Ben-Nissan B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 21815837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study.
Demenko V; Linetskiy I; Nesvit K; Hubalkova H; Nesvit V; Shevchenko A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 22616897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
