These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Web-based comparison of historical vs contemporary methods of fetal heart rate interpretation. Epstein AJ; Iriye BK; Hancock L; Quilligan EJ; Rumney PJ; Hancock J; Ghamsary M; Eakin CM; Smith C; Wing DA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):488.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27094965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal heart monitoring in labour: from pinard to artificial intelligence. Jauniaux E; Prefumo F BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):870. PubMed ID: 27101261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Classic pages in Obstetrics and Gynecology. The graphic analysis of labor. Emanuel A. Friedman. Friedman EA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Dec; 132(7):822-3. PubMed ID: 362927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Study of uterine contractility by the method of measuring the changes in the intra-amniotic pressure and the intramyometrial pressure (Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia)]. DANESES IM Hell Iatr; 1962 Dec; 31():1151-68. PubMed ID: 14024889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Basis and practice of medical electronics in obstetrics. 3. A monitoring system used during delivery and an interpretation of its records]. Murooka K Josanpu Zasshi; 1977 Mar; 31(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 586280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic value of continuous monitoring during labor]. Tsvigun VS Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1976 Mar; (3):27-31. PubMed ID: 970571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Obstetrics in Graz. A comparison 1887-1987]. Burghardt E; Mayer HO Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1989 Dec; 101(24):843-50. PubMed ID: 2696210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]