These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21811053)

  • 1. Sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity in children during their periods of visual development.
    Li L; Su Y; Chen CZ; Feng C; Zheng HM; Xing YQ
    Ophthalmologica; 2011; 226(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21811053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new method of extrapolating the sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity.
    Zhou P; Zhao MW; Li XX; Hu XF; Wu X; Niu LJ; Yu WZ; Xu XL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 117(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 17972124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of objective assessment using the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity (SPVERA) and illiterate E visual acuity].
    Liu RJ; Liu HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17190145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients.
    Bach M; Maurer JP; Wolf ME
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 92(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 18303162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.
    Chen SI; Chandna A; Norcia AM; Pettet M; Stone D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):614-9. PubMed ID: 16431958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Establishment of the sweep pattern visual evoked potential system and its application].
    Li XP; Zhang C; Hu J; Wu J; Zhu YM; Li HS
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 19537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term changes in visual acuity and refractive error in amblyopes.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 15252350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy of penalization methods in moderate to mild amblyopia.
    Tejedor J; Ogallar C
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 145(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 18207121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial-frequency-dependent changes in cortical activation before and after patching in amblyopic children.
    Weiss AH; Kelly JP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3531-7. PubMed ID: 15452059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blue filter amblyopia treatment protocol for strabismic amblyopia: a prospective comparative study of 50 cases.
    Metzler U; Ham O; Flores V; Claramunt M; Sepulveda C; Casanova D
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 1998; 13(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9852438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in visual evoked potentials curve parameters in children with amblyopia].
    Karlica D; Galetović D; Bućan K; Znaor L; Skelin S
    Acta Med Croatica; 2009 Oct; 63(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 20034333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of visual disability using visual evoked potentials.
    Jeon J; Oh S; Kyung S
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 12():36. PubMed ID: 22866948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pilot study of anisometropic amblyopia improved in adults and children by perceptual learning: an alternative treatment to patching.
    Chen PL; Chen JT; Fu JJ; Chien KH; Lu DW
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 18761479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice.
    Stewart CE; Moseley MJ; Fielder AR; Stephens DA;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 88(12):1552-6. PubMed ID: 15548811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of All Causes of Visual Function Loss in Children With Congenital Blepharoptosis.
    Ural O; Mocan MC; Erdener U
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 32203593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 109(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 15957609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles or in combination with translucent Bangerter filters.
    Agervi P; Kugelberg U; Kugelberg M; Simonsson G; Fornander M; Zetterström C
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1475-80. PubMed ID: 19500854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates.
    Ridder WH; McCulloch D; Herbert AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 39(13):2759-68. PubMed ID: 9856787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.