266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21811168)
1. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study.
Leong DJ; Chan HL; Yeh CY; Takarakis N; Fu JH; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 21811168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support.
Krekmanov L; Kahn M; Rangert B; Lindström H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 10874806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of tilted implants in treatment of the atrophic posterior mandible: a preliminary report of a novel approach.
Pancko F; Dyer J; Weisglass S; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 20116715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of lingual plate perforation for virtual immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A computer simulation study.
Huang RY; Cochran DL; Cheng WC; Lin MH; Fan WH; Sung CE; Mau LP; Huang PH; Shieh YS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Oct; 146(10):735-42. PubMed ID: 26409983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A surgical guide for dental implant placement in edentulous posterior regions.
Atsu SS
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 16911890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Avoiding osseous grafting in the atrophic posterior mandible for implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a report of 2 cases.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20925498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ridge alterations following flapless immediate implant placement with or without immediate loading. Part II: a histometric study in the Beagle dog.
Blanco J; Liñares A; Pérez J; Muñoz F
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):762-70. PubMed ID: 21752045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small diameter implants: specific indications and considerations for the posterior mandible: a case report.
Jackson BJ
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():156-64. PubMed ID: 20545550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
