These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21811837)

  • 1. Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.
    Stelzel C; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):476-90. PubMed ID: 21811837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 21858664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modality-specific effects of mental fatigue in multitasking.
    Mueckstein M; Heinzel S; Granacher U; Brahms M; Rapp MA; Stelzel C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103766. PubMed ID: 36242924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings: Modality-incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching.
    Stephan DN; Fintor E; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Apr; 224():103502. PubMed ID: 35131493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.
    Fintor E; Poljac E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):380-388. PubMed ID: 29926170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory-motor modality compatibility.
    Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Defer A; Ibrahime S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):752-772. PubMed ID: 29285603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2346-2363. PubMed ID: 32895726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 26377338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-Related Interference between the Selection of Input-Output Modality Mappings and Postural Control-a Pilot Study.
    Stelzel C; Schauenburg G; Rapp MA; Heinzel S; Granacher U
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():613. PubMed ID: 28484411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.
    Schaeffner S; Koch I; Philipp AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():210-218. PubMed ID: 30312892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements.
    Stephan DN; Koch I; Hendler J; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 23047914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How conceptual overlap and modality pairings affect task-switching and mixing costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 29043435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):350-368. PubMed ID: 32223289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.