These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21812677)

  • 21. Parenthood by pure intention: assisted reproduction and the functional approach to parentage.
    Storrow RF
    Hastings Law J; 2002 Mar; 53(3):597-679. PubMed ID: 12680380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Private embryos, public policy.
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6911):1. PubMed ID: 12422166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The politics of bioethics.
    Cohen E; Kristol W
    Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethics: China already has clear stem-cell guidelines.
    Cheng L; Qiu RZ; Deng H; Zhang YA; Jin Y; Li L
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of the federal government in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Lal M
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1997; 13(2):517-43. PubMed ID: 16528854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human-nonhuman chimeras: a regulatory proposal on the blurring of species lines.
    Kopinksi NE
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 2004 May; 45(3):619-66. PubMed ID: 16514749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canadians finally fill regulatory void with stem-cell bill.
    Kondro W
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9413):955. PubMed ID: 15046117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clones, controversy, and criminal law: a comment on the proposal for legislation governing assisted human reproduction.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 39(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 12611408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act: protecting women's health while potentially allowing human somatic cell nuclear transfer into non-human oocytes.
    Mykitiuk R; Nisker J; Bluhm R
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 Feb; 7(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 17366204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reference re assisted human reproduction actand the future of technology-assisted reproduction and embryo research in Canada.
    Ogbogu U
    Health Law J; 2011; 19():153-87. PubMed ID: 23185905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
    Daar JF
    Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Not cloning: new embryo research has sparked controversy.
    Economist; 2003 Oct; 369(8346):79. PubMed ID: 15356882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
    Fowler HL
    Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
    Bowens KK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004).
    Fineschi V; Neri M; Turillazzi E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Sep; 31(9):536-9. PubMed ID: 16131556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A brief review of current and proposed federal government regulation of assisted reproduction laboratories in the United States.
    Carrell DT; Cartmill D
    J Androl; 2002; 23(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 12185090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bankrolling stem-cell research with California dollars.
    Yamamoto KR
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1711-3. PubMed ID: 15496617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The ever-widening gap between the science of artificial reproductive technology and the laws which govern that technology.
    Havins WE; Dalessio JJ
    De Paul Law Rev; 1999; 48(4):825-66. PubMed ID: 12484397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro fertility proposals by Bush council stir controversy.
    Regalado A
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2003 Nov; ():B1, B6. PubMed ID: 14971380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stem cells and the states: promulgating constitutional bans on embryonic experimentation.
    Harris MR
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 2002; 37(1):243-91. PubMed ID: 15214358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.