These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21812708)

  • 1. Supervised versus unsupervised categorization: two sides of the same coin?
    Pothos EM; Edwards DJ; Perlman A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1692-713. PubMed ID: 21812708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks.
    Pothos EM; Perlman A; Bailey TM; Kurtz K; Edwards DJ; Hines P; McDonnell JV
    Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 21733497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsupervised Categorization in a sample of children with autism spectrum disorders.
    Edwards DJ; Perlman A; Reed P
    Res Dev Disabil; 2012; 33(4):1264-9. PubMed ID: 22502853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unsupervised categorization and category learning.
    Pothos EM; Chater N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):733-52. PubMed ID: 16104104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity model, and the generalized context model.
    Pothos EM; Bailey TM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1062-80. PubMed ID: 19586270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congruency effects in conceptualizing for speech.
    Kuipers JR; La Heij W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2155-68. PubMed ID: 22630114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whichever way you choose to categorize, working memory helps you learn.
    Craig S; Lewandowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):439-64. PubMed ID: 22022921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The costs of supervised classification: The effect of learning task on conceptual flexibility.
    Hoffman AB; Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):319-40. PubMed ID: 20438254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach.
    Pothos EM; Close J
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):581-602. PubMed ID: 18083157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An extended study of the nonindependence of stimulus properties in human classification learning.
    Mathy F; Bradmetz J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):41-64. PubMed ID: 20680890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dyslexic participants show intact spontaneous categorization processes.
    Nikolopoulos DS; Pothos EM
    Dyslexia; 2009 Aug; 15(3):167-86. PubMed ID: 18819159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A probabilistic model of cross-categorization.
    Shafto P; Kemp C; Mansinghka V; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2011 Jul; 120(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 21377146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unsupervised category learning with integral-dimension stimuli.
    Ell SW; Ashby FG; Hutchinson S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1537-62. PubMed ID: 22506861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can semi-supervised learning explain incorrect beliefs about categories?
    Kalish CW; Rogers TT; Lang J; Zhu X
    Cognition; 2011 Jul; 120(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 21474122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of training sequence and between-category similarity on unsupervised induction.
    Clapper JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1370-90. PubMed ID: 25384115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brief communication: the role of category structure in determining the effects of stimulus preexposure on categorization accuracy.
    Wills AJ; Suret M; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 14690850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.