251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21812743)
1. The use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III with clinical populations: a preliminary exploration.
Milne S; McDonald J; Comino EJ
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2012 Feb; 32(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 21812743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2.
Connolly BH; McClune NO; Gatlin R
Pediatr Phys Ther; 2012; 24(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 22965209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternate scoring of the Bayley-III improves prediction of performance on Griffiths Mental Development Scales before school entry in preschoolers with developmental concerns.
Milne SL; McDonald JL; Comino EJ
Child Care Health Dev; 2015 Mar; 41(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 25040260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery.
Acton BV; Biggs WS; Creighton DE; Penner KA; Switzer HN; Thomas JH; Joffe AR; Robertson CM
Pediatrics; 2011 Oct; 128(4):e794-800. PubMed ID: 21949148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III).
Chinta S; Walker K; Halliday R; Loughran-Fowlds A; Badawi N
Arch Dis Child; 2014 Jul; 99(7):621-4. PubMed ID: 24504506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition.
Scattone D; Raggio DJ; May W
Psychol Rep; 2011 Oct; 109(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 22238860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental and functional outcomes in children with a positive newborn screen for Krabbe disease: a pilot study of a phone-based interview surveillance technique.
Duffner PK; Granger C; Lyon N; Niewczyk P; Barczykowski A; Bauer S; Msall ME
J Pediatr; 2012 Aug; 161(2):258-63.e1. PubMed ID: 22381022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants.
Yu YT; Hsieh WS; Hsu CH; Chen LC; Lee WT; Chiu NC; Wu YC; Jeng SF
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3875-83. PubMed ID: 24029804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing developmental delay in early childhood - concerns with the Bayley-III scales.
Anderson PJ; Burnett A
Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):371-381. PubMed ID: 27687612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of 2-year-old children after early surgery for congenital heart disease on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition.
Long SH; Galea MP; Eldridge BJ; Harris SR
Early Hum Dev; 2012 Aug; 88(8):603-7. PubMed ID: 22336496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Children born extremely preterm show significant lower cognitive, language and motor function levels compared with children born at term, as measured by the Bayley-III at 2.5 years.
MÃ¥nsson J; Stjernqvist K
Acta Paediatr; 2014 May; 103(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 24494838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developmental assessment of VLBW infants at 18 months of age: A comparison study between KSPD and Bayley III.
Kono Y; Yonemoto N; Kusuda S; Hirano S; Iwata O; Tanaka K; Nakazawa J
Brain Dev; 2016 Apr; 38(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 26542468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the ASQ and PEDS in screening for developmental delay in children presenting for primary care.
Limbos MM; Joyce DP
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2011 Sep; 32(7):499-511. PubMed ID: 21760526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent validity of the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition.
Peyton C; Msall ME; Wroblewski K; Rogers EE; Kohn M; Glass HC
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 Mar; 63(3):349-354. PubMed ID: 33206384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive validity of the Bayley, Third Edition at 2 years for intelligence quotient at 4 years in preterm infants.
Bode MM; DʼEugenio DB; Mettelman BB; Gross SJ
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2014; 35(9):570-5. PubMed ID: 25370298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of a routine developmental follow-up program for children with congenital heart disease: early results.
Soto CB; Olude O; Hoffmann RG; Bear L; Chin A; Dasgupta M; Mussatto K
Congenit Heart Dis; 2011; 6(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 21718458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Vineland Social Maturity Scale, the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales--survey form, and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with infants evaluated for developmental delay.
Raggio DJ; Massingale TW
Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 1):931-7. PubMed ID: 7506826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A population-based study to determine the performance of the Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale to Predict the Mental Developmental Index at 18 Months on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II in very preterm infants.
Vincer MJ; Cake H; Graven M; Dodds L; McHugh S; Fraboni T
Pediatrics; 2005 Dec; 116(6):e864-7. PubMed ID: 16263973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2) in 12-month-old infants.
Connolly BH; Dalton L; Smith JB; Lamberth NG; McCay B; Murphy W
Pediatr Phys Ther; 2006; 18(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 16912639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a test battery (NPM-X) for neuropsychological and neuromotor examination of children with developmental disabilities or mental retardation. A theoretical and clinical study.
Gjaerum B
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 1997; 390():1-55. PubMed ID: 9212855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
