These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21813217)

  • 1. Innovative mathematical modeling in environmental remediation.
    Yeh GT; Gwo JP; Siegel MD; Li MH; Fang Y; Zhang F; Luo W; Yabusaki SB
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 May; 119():26-38. PubMed ID: 21813217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variably saturated flow and multicomponent biogeochemical reactive transport modeling of a uranium bioremediation field experiment.
    Yabusaki SB; Fang Y; Williams KH; Murray CJ; Ward AL; Dayvault RD; Waichler SR; Newcomer DR; Spane FA; Long PE
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Nov; 126(3-4):271-90. PubMed ID: 22115092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radioecological assessment and remediation planning at the former uranium milling facilities at the Pridnieprovsky Chemical Plant in Ukraine.
    Lavrova T; Voitsekhovych O
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 Jan; 115():118-23. PubMed ID: 22922426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model-based analysis of the role of biological, hydrological and geochemical factors affecting uranium bioremediation.
    Zhao J; Scheibe TD; Mahadevan R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Jul; 108(7):1537-48. PubMed ID: 21337330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct coupling of a genome-scale microbial in silico model and a groundwater reactive transport model.
    Fang Y; Scheibe TD; Mahadevan R; Garg S; Long PE; Lovley DR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Mar; 122(1-4):96-103. PubMed ID: 21172725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulating bioremediation of uranium-contaminated aquifers; uncertainty assessment of model parameters.
    Wang S; Jaffé PR; Li G; Wang SW; Rabitz HA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Jul; 64(3-4):283-307. PubMed ID: 12814885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupational exposure during remediation works at a uranium tailings pile.
    Dinis Mde L; Fiúza A
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 May; 119():63-9. PubMed ID: 22974553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uranium partition coefficients (Kd) in forest surface soil reveal long equilibrium times and vary by site and soil size fraction.
    Whicker JJ; Pinder JE; Ibrahim SA; Stone JM; Breshears DD; Baker KN
    Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 17563491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uranium removal from groundwater via in situ biostimulation: Field-scale modeling of transport and biological processes.
    Yabusaki SB; Fang Y; Long PE; Resch CT; Peacock AD; Komlos J; Jaffe PR; Morrison SJ; Dayvault RD; White DC; Anderson RT
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):216-35. PubMed ID: 17442451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of contaminant levels and remediation efficacy in groundwater at a former in situ recovery uranium mine.
    Borch T; Roche N; Johnson TE
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Jul; 14(7):1814-23. PubMed ID: 22706154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying and overcoming the constraints that prevent the full implementation of decommissioning and remediation programs in uranium mining sites.
    Franklin MR; Fernandes HM
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 May; 119():48-54. PubMed ID: 21955840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical stability assessment of uranyl phosphates and apatites: selection of amendments for in situ remediation of uranium.
    Raicevic S; Wright JV; Veljkovic V; Conca JL
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Feb; 355(1-3):13-24. PubMed ID: 15885755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational modelling of final covers for uranium mill tailings impoundments.
    Leoni GL; Almeida Mde S; Fernandes HM
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 110(1-3):139-49. PubMed ID: 15177735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface complexation modeling of U(VI) adsorption by aquifer sediments from a former mill tailings site at Rifle, Colorado.
    Hyun SP; Fox PM; Davis JA; Campbell KM; Hayes KF; Long PE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9368-73. PubMed ID: 20000531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrokinetic in situ oxidation remediation: assessment of parameter sensitivities and the influence of aquifer heterogeneity on remediation efficiency.
    Wu MZ; Reynolds DA; Fourie A; Prommer H; Thomas DG
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Aug; 136-137():72-85. PubMed ID: 22684143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sorption of uranium (VI) on homoionic sodium smectite experimental study and surface complexation modeling.
    Korichi S; Bensmaili A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):780-93. PubMed ID: 19428178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium.
    Gavrilescu M; Pavel LV; Cretescu I
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Apr; 163(2-3):475-510. PubMed ID: 18771850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling uranium transport in acidic contaminated groundwater with base addition.
    Zhang F; Luo W; Parker JC; Brooks SC; Watson DB; Jardine PM; Gu B
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Jun; 190(1-3):863-8. PubMed ID: 21531075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling in-situ uranium(VI) bioreduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Luo J; Weber FA; Cirpka OA; Wu WM; Nyman JL; Carley J; Jardine PM; Criddle CS; Kitanidis PK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):129-48. PubMed ID: 17291626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reaction-based paradigm to model reactive chemical transport in groundwater with general kinetic and equilibrium reactions.
    Zhang F; Yeh GT; Parker JC; Brooks SC; Pace MN; Kim YJ; Jardine PM; Watson DB
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):10-32. PubMed ID: 17229488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.