These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21814359)

  • 1. Comparing microleakage and layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in class V cavities using confocal microscopy: An in vitro study.
    Usha H; Kumari A; Mehta D; Kaiwar A; Jain N
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 21814359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities.
    Bagis YH; Baltacioglu IH; Kahyaogullari S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 19830973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
    Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins using different restorative techniques over time.
    Khosravi K; Mousavinasab SM; Samani MS
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 25878680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of TiF4 in Microleakage of Silorane and Methacrylate-based Composite Resins in Class V Cavities.
    Koohpeima F; Sharafeddin F; Jowkar Z; Ahmadzadeh S; Mokhtari MJ; Azarian B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 27207205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal sealing ability of silorane and methacrylate resin composites in class II cavities: A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Nanjundasetty JK; Nanda S; Panuganti V; Marigowda JC
    J Conserv Dent; 2013 Nov; 16(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 24347882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives.
    Mousavinasab SM; Ghasemi M; Yadollahi M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2018 Jul; 15(4):240-249. PubMed ID: 30405733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur.
    Yaman BC; Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Erdilek D; Yazıcıoğlu O
    Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 26(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 20162317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal Microleakage of Low-shrinkage Composite Silorane in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
    Poureslami HR; Sajadi F; Sharifi M; Farzin Ebrahimi S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 22991645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite.
    Al-Boni R; Raja OM
    J Conserv Dent; 2010 Jul; 13(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 21116392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of fiber reinforcement on microleakage of class II cavities restored with a novel G-aenial posterior composite, silorane composite, and nanohybrid composite: an in vitro comparative study.
    Agrawal V; Kapoor S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26748965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations.
    Ergin E; Oz FD; Gurgan S
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    Ahmed W; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Prakki A; El-Mowafy O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
    Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavities restored with Ceram X and Filtek P-90: An in vitro study.
    Bogra P; Gupta S; Kumar S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Jan; 3(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22557890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cyclic loading on microleakage of silorane based composite compared with low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites.
    Kermanshah H; Yasini E; Hoseinifar R
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 27274348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study.
    Venugopal K; Krishnaprasad L; V P PS; Ravi AB; Haridas K; Soman D
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S132-S136. PubMed ID: 34447061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class V preparations restored with Hybrid versus Silorane composites.
    Umer F; Naz F; Khan FR
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21814346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.