BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21815370)

  • 1. Investigation of effective decision criteria for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.
    Holdsworth C; Stewart RD; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2964-74. PubMed ID: 21815370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hierarchical evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.
    Holdsworth C; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4986-97. PubMed ID: 20964218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to increase flexibility in the search for better IMRT plans.
    Holdsworth C; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2261-74. PubMed ID: 22482647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning.
    Fiege J; McCurdy B; Potrebko P; Champion H; Cull A
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5217-29. PubMed ID: 21978066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system.
    Fogliata A; Thompson S; Stravato A; Tomatis S; Scorsetti M; Cozzi L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):106-114. PubMed ID: 29152846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
    Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
    Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personalized treatment planning with a model of radiation therapy outcomes for use in multiobjective optimization of IMRT plans for prostate cancer.
    Smith WP; Kim M; Holdsworth C; Liao J; Phillips MH
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():38. PubMed ID: 26968687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target miss using PTV-based IMRT compared to robust optimization via coverage probability concept in prostate cancer.
    Outaggarts Z; Wegener D; Berger B; Zips D; Paulsen F; Bleif M; Thorwarth D; Alber M; Dohm O; Müller AC
    Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):911-917. PubMed ID: 32436467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of biological-based and dose volume-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans generated using the same treatment planning system.
    Senthilkumar K; Maria Das KJ
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019 Mar; 15(Supplement):S33-S38. PubMed ID: 30900617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
    Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study.
    Lian J; Yuan L; Ge Y; Chera BS; Yoo DP; Chang S; Yin F; Wu QJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121704. PubMed ID: 24320490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
    Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
    Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
    Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
    Sayre GA; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Superiority of equivalent uniform dose (EUD)-based optimization for breast and chest wall.
    Mihailidis DN; Plants B; Farinash L; Harmon M; Whaley L; Raja P; Tomara P
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 19931018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.