These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21815370)

  • 21. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
    Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A role for biological optimization within the current treatment planning paradigm.
    Das S
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4672-82. PubMed ID: 19928099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system.
    Semenenko VA; Reitz B; Day E; Qi XS; Miften M; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5851-60. PubMed ID: 19175141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Kamal Sayed H; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2049-2060. PubMed ID: 32077497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT.
    Malone S; Croke J; Roustan-Delatour N; Belanger E; Avruch L; Malone C; Morash C; Kayser C; Underhill K; Li Y; Malone K; Nyiri B; Spaans J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):725-32. PubMed ID: 22444999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inverse-optimized 3D conformal planning: minimizing complexity while achieving equivalence with beamlet IMRT in multiple clinical sites.
    Fraass BA; Steers JM; Matuszak MM; McShan DL
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3361-74. PubMed ID: 22755717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Esophagus sparing with IMRT in lung tumor irradiation: an EUD-based optimization technique.
    Chapet O; Thomas E; Kessler ML; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 16111587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Kamal-Sayed H; Ma J; Tseung H; Abdel-Rehim A; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5643-5652. PubMed ID: 30332515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A quality control method for intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning based on generalized equivalent uniform dose.
    Pang H; Sun X; Yang B; Wu J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):276-282. PubMed ID: 29696777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers.
    Prior P; Chen X; Botros M; Paulson ES; Lawton C; Erickson B; Li XA
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3819-42. PubMed ID: 27089554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
    Moore KL; Brame RS; Low DA; Mutic S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):545-51. PubMed ID: 21277097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Wu Y; Zhou J; Liu HH; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 12608607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating multi-objective fluence and beam orientation IMRT optimization.
    Potrebko PS; Fiege J; Biagioli M; Poleszczuk J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(13):5228-5244. PubMed ID: 28493848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans.
    Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
    Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
    Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
    Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. EUD-based biological optimization for carbon ion therapy.
    Brüningk SC; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6248-57. PubMed ID: 26520717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dosimetric comparison between jaw tracking and static jaw techniques in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Feng Z; Wu H; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Cheng J; Su X
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jan; 10():28. PubMed ID: 25623899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of organ motion on conformal vs. intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Hysing LB; Skorpen TN; Alber M; Fjellsbø LB; Helle SI; Muren LP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1496-503. PubMed ID: 18538493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
    Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.