250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21815387)
1. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans--Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system.
Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Benedek H; Nilsson P; Knöös T
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3130-8. PubMed ID: 21815387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beam commissioning and measurements validating the beam model in a new TPS that converts helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans.
Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Knöös T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 21361173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poster - Thur Eve - 72: Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans into clinically favourable step-and-shoot IMRT plans deliverable on a c-arm linac.
Studinski R; Alexander A; La Russa D
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part4):4638. PubMed ID: 28516637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion of the helical tomotherapy plans to the step-and-shoot IMRT plans for patients with hip prosthesis during radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Olmińska M; Piotrowski T; Litoborska J; Pawałowski B; Jodda A
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 26674461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases.
Wiezorek T; Brachwitz T; Georg D; Blank E; Fotina I; Habl G; Kretschmer M; Lutters G; Salz H; Schubert K; Wagner D; Wendt TG
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21338501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A planning and delivery study of a rotational IMRT technique with burst delivery.
Kainz K; Chen GP; Chang YW; Prah D; Sharon Qi X; Shukla HP; Stahl J; Allen Li X
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5104-18. PubMed ID: 21978056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans.
Du W; Cho SH; Zhang X; Hoffman KE; Kudchadker RJ
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021716. PubMed ID: 24506607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer.
van Vulpen M; Field C; Raaijmakers CP; Parliament MB; Terhaard CH; MacKenzie MA; Scrimger R; Lagendijk JJ; Fallone BG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1535-9. PubMed ID: 15925457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel implementation of mARC treatment for non-dedicated planning systems using converted IMRT plans.
Dzierma Y; Nuesken F; Licht N; Ruebe C
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Aug; 8():193. PubMed ID: 23915350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning.
Fiege J; McCurdy B; Potrebko P; Champion H; Cull A
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5217-29. PubMed ID: 21978066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of treatment plan quality of IMRT and VMAT with and without flattening filter using Pareto optimal fronts.
Lechner W; Kragl G; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24183067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
