These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21815870)

  • 1. Permissible performance limits of regression analyses in method comparisons.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Al Shareef N
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 49(11):1805-16. PubMed ID: 21815870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence in Altman-Bland plots: a critical review of the method of differences.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 19719745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression - a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate.
    Motulsky HJ; Brown RE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():123. PubMed ID: 16526949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing assay linearity over a pre-specified range.
    Yang H; Novick SJ; LeBlond D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 25356663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for analyzing data from probabilistic linkage strategies based on partially identifying variables.
    Hof MH; Zwinderman AH
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4231-42. PubMed ID: 22807060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction of non-linearity by data transformation in method comparison and commutability studies.
    Stöckl D; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(12):1784-5. PubMed ID: 18973465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A pragmatic proposal for permissible limits in external quality assessment schemes with a compromise between biological variation and the state of the art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Kratochvila J; Carobene A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 50(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22628326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with reference method by use of difference plots.
    Petersen PH; Stöckl D; Blaabjerg O; Pedersen B; Birkemose E; Thienpont L; Lassen JF; Kjeldsen J
    Clin Chem; 1997 Nov; 43(11):2039-46. PubMed ID: 9365386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement variation in method comparison studies: an empirical examination.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Tomchek SD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 May; 75(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 8185441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method validation revisited: a chemometric approach.
    Cardone MJ; Willavize SA; Lacy ME
    Pharm Res; 1990 Feb; 7(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 2308895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement error correction using validation data: a review of methods and their applicability in case-control studies.
    Thürigen D; Spiegelman D; Blettner M; Heuer C; Brenner H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):447-74. PubMed ID: 11191260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.